H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Thomas Johansson vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 1-2
Mark Woodforde holds a 2–1 lead over Thomas Johansson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1998 Monte Carlo Masters second round 5-7 7-6(10) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1998* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mark Woodforde | 5-7 7-6(10) 6-3 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1997* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-3 6-4 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Oct 18, 1996* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 6-3 7-6(3) | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Johansson | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |