H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Thomas Johansson vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 2-0

Thomas Johansson holds a 2–0 lead over Markus Hipfl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Johansson leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2002 Australian Open round of 64 6-4 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Johansson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Markus Hipfl
AUT Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Johansson #18 6-4 6-1 6-4 Markus Hipfl #75 Match data Jan 18, 2002* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Thomas Johansson #18 6-7(4) 6-4 4-1 (ret.) Markus Hipfl #79 Match data Oct 25, 2001* R32 Stockholm Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 337 279 54.7% 1 1 0 0 7 9
Markus Hipfl #1,538 #63 678 1,686 55 78 41.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Johansson Markus Hipfl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #768 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #1275 1,485 0 0
18 1993 2–1 66.7% — 1,534 0 0 1996 1–2 33.3% #451 1,493 0 0
19 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0 1997 0–2 0.0% #231 1,462 0 0
20 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,491 0 0 1998 3–3 50.0% #137 1,507 0 0
21 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0 1999 15–15 50.0% #76 1,591 0 0
22 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,700 0 2 2000 8–12 40.0% #119 1,571 0 0
23 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,897 0 2 2001 14–18 43.8% #76 1,574 0 0
24 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,736 0 3 2002 11–17 39.3% #125 1,566 0 0
25 2000 22–26 45.8% #39 1,819 0 4 2003 3–6 33.3% #279 1,509 0 0
26 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6 — — — — — — —
27 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,745 1 7 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,476 0 0
29 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,853 1 8 — — — — — — —
30 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9 — — — — — — —
31 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,706 1 9 — — — — — — —
32 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,756 1 9 — — — — — — —
33 2008 12–18 40.0% #136 1,668 1 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Johansson Markus Hipfl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1997 15 13 28 53.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 2000 1 4 5 20.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1998 27 14 41 65.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 2001 0 5 5 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2002 3 4 7 42.9% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2000 17 17 34 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 11 1 12 91.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 17 12 29 58.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2004 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 19 14 33 57.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 3 13 76.9% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 197 155 352 56.0% 29 58 87 33.3% 46 30 76 60.5% 65 36 101 64.4% — 5 17 22 22.7% 49 53 102 48.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Johansson Markus Hipfl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1491 99.9 +1.43 -2.60 0.570 41.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1485 101.0 +0.52 +1.20 0.633 40.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
18 1993 1535 112.9 — — — — +33 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.12 1996 1493 109.0 -1.54 +0.61 0.895 47.2% — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.24
19 1994 1496 98.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 1–1 — +0.29 1997 1462 98.2 -0.14 -2.54 0.995 49.8% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 1995 1492 111.1 — — — — +52 — — 22.2% -1.56 — 0–1 — -0.10 1998 1508 114.6 -0.71 +0.31 0.894 47.3% — +41 — 46.7% -0.40 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — -0.23
21 1996 1764 141.3 — — — — -11 -212 -55 54.7% +0.46 10–7 (59%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.21 1999 1591 128.5 -0.84 +2.00 1.075 50.9% -78 +74 — 52.6% +0.26 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — +1.06
22 1997 1700 139.6 — — — — +91 -202 -7 52.7% +0.37 11–10 (52%) 3–17 (15%) — +2.54 2000 1571 126.9 -1.56 +0.32 0.972 49.4% -93 +109 — 43.1% -0.69 3–4 (43%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.49
23 1998 1897 149.9 — — — — +15 -423 -194 57.3% +0.51 12–13 (48%) 22–20 (52%) — -1.44 2001 1574 134.5 -2.21 +1.33 0.953 49.0% -129 +138 -96 48.6% -0.18 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) — -1.27
24 1999 1736 138.9 — — — — +44 -276 — 50.9% -0.01 9–9 (50%) 8–8 (50%) — +1.29 2002 1567 127.4 -2.40 +0.71 0.934 48.7% -69 +91 — 47.1% -0.21 0–7 (0%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.81
25 2000 1819 138.5 — — — — -4 -362 -90 50.0% +0.02 5–7 (42%) 17–12 (59%) — -0.07 2003 1509 95.1 -5.51 -3.56 0.693 43.6% — +73 — 33.3% -2.00 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.38
26 2001 1875 151.0 — — — — -19 -371 -11 61.5% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 15–12 (56%) — -2.47 2004 1495 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1746 143.8 — — — — +68 -189 +40 53.6% +0.32 8–8 (50%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.26 2005 1477 99.0 +0.24 -0.09 0.886 47.6% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.22
29 2004 1854 148.2 +3.00 +0.83 1.073 51.2% +2 -283 +23 56.9% +0.25 8–8 (50%) 18–11 (62%) — -2.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1893 147.3 +4.53 -0.04 1.141 52.0% -3 -302 +122 61.8% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 22–15 (59%) — +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1706 134.4 +1.47 -2.65 0.941 49.2% +107 -165 +193 41.4% -0.30 4–5 (44%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1757 138.7 +0.88 -2.95 0.918 48.8% +47 -210 +10 45.9% -0.46 7–5 (58%) 14–13 (52%) — -2.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1668 132.9 -0.51 -1.77 0.876 47.7% +18 -129 +90 34.8% -0.74 4–2 (67%) 5–9 (36%) — -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1652 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1969 149.0 +2.39 -1.00 1.014 50.2% +27 -268 +7 53.4% +0.24 98–93 (51%) 151–153 (50%) 99.5 -0.95 — 1687 129.6 -1.94 +0.67 0.942 48.7% -90 +96 -96 46.1% -0.38 13–27 (33%) 17–14 (55%) 95.8 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.