H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomas Johansson vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 2-1
Thomas Johansson holds a 2–1 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Thomas Johansson leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 2000 Australian Open first round 6-1 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 6-1 6-2 6-4 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1999* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Nicklas Kulti | 6-3 7-5 | Thomas Johansson | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1997* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Thomas Johansson | 7-5 6-3 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Johansson | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |