H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 19:16 UTC
Thomas Johansson vs P. Cane H2H: 1-0
Thomas Johansson holds a 1–0 lead over P. Cane in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Johansson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 1993 Bolzano fourth round 7-6(5) 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1993* | Bolzano | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Thomas Johansson | 7-6(5) 7-6(1) | P. Cane | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Johansson | #586 | #7 | 2,365 | 1,969 | 336 | 277 | 54.8% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 |
| P. Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Johansson | P. Cane | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #422 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #486 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #117 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #60 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #39 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 46–30 | 60.5% | #17 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #39 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2000 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #39 | 1,825 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2001 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2002 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #14 | 1,746 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #30 | 1,855 | 1 | 8 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2005 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,892 | 1 | 9 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #71 | 1,723 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2007 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,759 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2008 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #136 | 1,673 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |