H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Thomas Johansson vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 2-0

Thomas Johansson holds a 2–0 lead over Sebastien Lareau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Johansson leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Johansson won the 1999 Canadian Open round of 16 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Johansson
SWE Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Sebastien Lareau
CAN Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Johansson #22 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 Sebastien Lareau #116 Match data Aug 7, 1999* R16 Canadian Open Masters 1000 Hard
Thomas Johansson #20 6-1 6-4 Sebastien Lareau #119 Match data Apr 17, 1999* QF Japan Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Johansson #586 #7 2,365 1,969 337 279 54.7% 1 1 0 0 7 9
Sebastien Lareau #1,018 #76 622 1,720 83 122 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Johansson Sebastien Lareau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,493 0 0
18 1993 2–1 66.7% — 1,534 0 0 1991 1–1 50.0% #349 1,505 0 0
19 1994 0–2 0.0% #486 1,496 0 0 1992 1–2 33.3% #197 1,501 0 0
20 1995 1–3 25.0% #117 1,491 0 0 1993 2–3 40.0% #131 1,531 0 0
21 1996 28–21 57.1% #60 1,763 0 0 1994 3–13 18.8% #119 1,482 0 0
22 1997 32–27 54.2% #39 1,700 0 2 1995 12–17 41.4% #136 1,557 0 0
23 1998 46–30 60.5% #17 1,897 0 2 1996 15–15 50.0% #105 1,676 0 0
24 1999 21–23 47.7% #39 1,736 0 3 1997 8–15 34.8% #187 1,591 0 0
25 2000 22–26 45.8% #39 1,819 0 4 1998 19–19 50.0% #79 1,657 0 0
26 2001 42–23 64.6% #18 1,875 0 6 1999 12–18 40.0% #102 1,616 0 0
27 2002 26–22 54.2% #14 1,745 1 7 2000 5–11 31.2% #124 1,597 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 5–7 41.7% #229 1,522 0 0
29 2004 29–20 59.2% #30 1,853 1 8 — — — — — — —
30 2005 42–24 63.6% #13 1,892 1 9 — — — — — — —
31 2006 11–16 40.7% #71 1,706 1 9 — — — — — — —
32 2007 23–23 50.0% #62 1,756 1 9 — — — — — — —
33 2008 12–18 40.0% #136 1,668 1 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Johansson Sebastien Lareau
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1996 13 10 23 56.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1994 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1997 15 13 28 53.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 15 5 20 75.0% 1995 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 1998 27 14 41 65.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 1996 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2000 17 17 34 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 11 1 12 91.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1999 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
27 2002 17 12 29 58.6% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2000 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2004 19 12 31 61.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 19 14 33 57.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 3 13 76.9% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 5 7 12 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 197 155 352 56.0% 29 58 87 33.3% 46 30 76 60.5% 65 36 101 64.4% — 57 80 137 41.6% 1 9 10 10.0% 12 19 31 38.7% 13 14 27 48.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Johansson Sebastien Lareau
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1494 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
18 1993 1535 112.9 — — — — +33 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.12 1991 1505 103.4 +1.23 -0.86 0.927 48.0% — — — 50.0% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — +0.22
19 1994 1496 98.1 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 1–1 — +0.29 1992 1502 106.2 -0.04 +0.85 1.094 50.9% +40 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.31
20 1995 1492 111.1 — — — — +52 — — 22.2% -1.56 — 0–1 — -0.10 1993 1531 110.6 -0.23 +0.55 0.687 43.1% — — +53 35.7% -1.21 1–0 2–0 — -0.06
21 1996 1764 141.3 — — — — -11 -212 -55 54.7% +0.46 10–7 (59%) 5–8 (38%) 103.6 +0.21 1994 1482 116.2 -2.66 -0.77 0.864 47.4% +32 — — 26.8% -1.29 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 99.4 +0.37
22 1997 1700 139.6 — — — — +91 -202 -7 52.7% +0.37 11–10 (52%) 3–17 (15%) 91.8 +2.54 1995 1558 135.8 +0.09 -0.30 0.971 49.2% +40 — -29 40.8% -0.44 2–4 (33%) 5–6 (45%) 97.8 -0.07
23 1998 1897 149.9 — — — — +15 -423 -194 57.3% +0.51 12–13 (48%) 22–20 (52%) 98.8 -1.44 1996 1677 142.6 +0.84 +2.33 1.084 51.2% -11 — -78 51.5% +0.25 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -1.30
24 1999 1736 138.9 — — — — +44 -276 — 50.9% -0.01 9–9 (50%) 8–8 (50%) 99.5 +1.29 1997 1591 120.1 -2.53 +0.23 0.910 48.2% +7 -69 +10 35.7% -0.84 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 99.1 -0.18
25 2000 1819 138.5 — — — — -4 -362 -90 50.0% +0.02 5–7 (42%) 17–12 (59%) 100.3 -0.07 1998 1658 133.0 +0.45 +0.31 1.002 49.8% +23 — -40 51.5% -0.07 5–6 (45%) 11–9 (55%) 103.4 +0.89
26 2001 1875 151.0 — — — — -19 -371 -11 61.5% +0.73 9–9 (50%) 15–12 (56%) 102.6 -2.47 1999 1617 128.1 +0.03 -1.37 0.950 49.1% +16 — +14 41.3% -0.45 6–7 (46%) 7–7 (50%) 100.5 +1.09
27 2002 1746 143.8 — — — — +68 -189 +40 53.6% +0.32 8–8 (50%) 11–12 (48%) 97.6 -0.26 2000 1598 117.1 -1.05 -1.01 0.904 48.4% +32 — +5 40.9% -0.57 0–5 (0%) 4–5 (44%) 94.2 +0.40
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1522 107.8 -0.57 -2.57 0.841 47.2% +60 — — 39.3% -0.89 3–1 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 +0.82
29 2004 1854 148.2 +3.00 +0.83 1.073 51.2% +2 -283 +23 56.9% +0.25 8–8 (50%) 18–11 (62%) 104.6 -2.69 2002 1503 93.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1893 147.3 +4.53 -0.04 1.141 52.0% -3 -302 +122 61.8% +0.69 10–8 (56%) 22–15 (59%) 103.3 +0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2006 1706 134.4 +1.47 -2.65 0.941 49.2% +107 -165 +193 41.4% -0.30 4–5 (44%) 7–12 (37%) 92.2 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2007 1757 138.7 +0.88 -2.95 0.918 48.8% +47 -210 +10 45.9% -0.46 7–5 (58%) 14–13 (52%) 101.2 -2.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2008 1668 132.9 -0.51 -1.77 0.876 47.7% +18 -129 +90 34.8% -0.74 4–2 (67%) 5–9 (36%) 98.1 -1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2009 1652 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1969 149.0 +2.39 -1.00 1.014 50.2% +27 -268 +7 53.4% +0.24 98–93 (51%) 151–153 (50%) 99.5 -0.95 — 1721 133.2 -0.41 -0.11 0.955 49.1% +21 -69 -10 42.5% -0.47 25–35 (42%) 43–47 (48%) 100.9 +1.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.