H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Amos Mansdorf H2H: 2-3

Amos Mansdorf holds a 3–2 lead over Thomas Muster in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Amos Mansdorf leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1994 Vienna third round 6-2 6-2.

AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ISR Age 60 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 20, 1994* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Carpet Thomas Muster #15 6-2 6-2 Amos Mansdorf #70 Match data
May 15, 1991* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Thomas Muster #34 6-4 6-2 Amos Mansdorf #45 Match data
Mar 10, 1989* Scottsdale ATP 250 R16 Hard Amos Mansdorf #26 7-5 6-2 Thomas Muster #13 Match data
Mar 10, 1988* Orlando ATP 250 R32 Hard Amos Mansdorf #26 6-3 6-2 Thomas Muster #57 Match data
Oct 24, 1987* Vienna ATP 250 SF Hard Amos Mansdorf #23 2-6 6-4 6-2 Thomas Muster #69 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Amos Mansdorf #514 #18 1,184 1,897 288 214 57.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Amos Mansdorf
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1981 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% 1,499 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 1984 3–2 60.0% #270 1,531 0 0
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1985 15–13 53.6% #84 1,672 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,799 0 1
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1987 35–21 62.5% #27 1,806 0 2
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1988 31–16 66.0% #26 1,853 0 4
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1989 29–19 60.4% #39 1,740 0 4
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1990 39–23 62.9% #33 1,827 0 5
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1991 21–25 45.7% #62 1,738 0 5
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1992 35–27 56.5% #25 1,771 0 5
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 1993 40–24 62.5% #25 1,787 0 6
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1994 20–25 44.4% #69 1,692 0 6
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44