H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Anders Jarryd H2H: 4-0

Thomas Muster holds a 4–0 lead over Anders Jarryd in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1990 US Open round of 64 6-4 6-3 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Anders Jarryd
SWE Age 65 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Muster #6 6-4 6-3 4-6 6-1 Anders Jarryd #116 Match data Aug 31, 1990* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Thomas Muster #17 5-1 (ret.) Anders Jarryd #126 Match data May 17, 1990* R32 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Thomas Muster #17 6-4 6-4 Anders Jarryd #36 Match data Oct 21, 1989* QF Vienna Open ATP 250 Carpet
Thomas Muster #13 6-0 6-4 Anders Jarryd #21 Match data Oct 27, 1988* R32 Paris Masters ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44
Anders Jarryd #1,316 #5 957 2,061 373 252 59.7% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Anders Jarryd
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1 1980 1–1 50.0% #182 1,515 0 0
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1981 11–12 47.8% #100 1,652 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5 1982 20–13 60.6% #58 1,751 0 2
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5 1983 35–20 63.6% #19 1,876 0 2
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8 1984 46–18 71.9% #6 1,985 0 4
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1985 51–20 71.8% #8 1,985 0 5
24 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13 1986 31–14 68.9% #19 1,885 0 6
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1987 39–19 67.2% #15 1,957 0 6
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23 1988 25–14 64.1% #32 1,808 0 6
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35 1989 22–15 59.5% #31 1,800 0 6
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42 1990 14–13 51.9% #73 1,821 0 7
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44 1991 26–21 55.3% #47 1,765 0 7
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44 1992 11–17 39.3% #150 1,594 0 7
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44 1993 15–18 45.5% #67 1,625 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 1994 12–12 50.0% #106 1,654 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 1995 13–17 43.3% #124 1,643 0 8
34 — — — — — — — 1996 1–8 11.1% #410 1,528 0 8
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Muster Anders Jarryd
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 1 6 83.3%
21 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1983 12 6 18 66.7% 14 8 22 63.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1984 20 5 25 80.0% 16 4 20 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
23 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 21 7 28 75.0%
24 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9%
25 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1987 16 8 24 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 10 4 14 71.4%
26 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1988 17 7 24 70.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1989 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 6 20 70.0%
28 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0%
29 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1991 7 7 14 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 14 8 22 63.6%
30 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 6 14 57.1%
31 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 12 6 18 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
42 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1% — 118 89 207 57.0% 77 62 139 55.4% 33 30 63 52.4% 145 71 216 67.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 527/612 of Thomas Muster's and 151/171 of Anders Jarryd's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Muster Anders Jarryd
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 1991 42/48 1.0 1.5 73.3% 62.9% 51.5% 61.3% 49.1% 59.6% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1992 52/62 2.0 1.9 66.2% 66.6% 53.3% 60.0% 44.4% 61.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 92/98 2.8 2.5 61.6% 71.7% 57.7% 62.0% 46.4% 66.1% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 68/80 4.0 3.5 58.1% 71.4% 54.0% 56.3% 46.4% 63.9% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1995 86/101 3.1 2.5 59.5% 71.9% 54.7% 56.6% 54.3% 64.8% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1996 71/86 3.2 2.3 59.3% 72.1% 53.3% 67.9% 45.7% 64.4% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1997 57/66 4.2 2.3 56.8% 73.4% 53.1% 65.8% 49.9% 64.4% 38.4% 1991 42/47 2.7 2.8 54.8% 70.4% 51.4% 59.7% 51.2% 61.8% 41.6%
30 1998 44/52 3.0 2.1 59.0% 69.3% 52.9% 59.8% 46.5% 62.1% 40.5% 1992 25/28 3.2 3.0 54.4% 69.9% 50.3% 54.8% 46.0% 60.6% 39.4%
31 1999 12/16 2.7 2.9 61.9% 62.8% 52.0% 61.2% 27.2% 58.1% 34.2% 1993 29/33 4.2 4.8 54.6% 71.4% 52.6% 55.1% 44.7% 62.7% 41.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 20/24 4.1 2.9 55.0% 73.8% 54.1% 53.2% 46.1% 64.8% 40.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 29/30 4.2 4.8 53.5% 73.8% 51.4% 57.2% 42.1% 63.3% 34.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 6/9 3.5 4.2 53.9% 69.1% 49.0% 43.3% 18.3% 59.7% 37.3%
42 2010 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.6% 62.5% 61.5% 66.7% — 62.1% 21.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 2/2 3.0 3.0 60.5% 55.9% 29.0% 35.3% 29.2% 45.6% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 527/858 3.0 2.4 61.2% 70.2% 54.1% 61.0% 47.4% 63.6% 42.3% — 151/625 3.6 3.7 54.4% 71.6% 51.7% 56.0% 45.4% 62.4% 39.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Muster Anders Jarryd
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.90 1980 1515 109.4 — — — — — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–1 — -0.09
19 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.14 1981 1653 136.0 — — — — -27 -54 -91 46.9% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.11
20 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.96 1982 1751 139.6 — — — — -32 -62 — 60.0% +0.57 4–2 (67%) 5–1 (83%) — +1.26
21 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.55 1983 1877 152.3 — — — — +8 -79 -263 59.1% +0.45 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.98
22 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.89 1984 1986 162.0 — — — — -5 -54 — 67.3% +1.28 10–8 (56%) 10–6 (63%) — -2.15
23 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.44 1985 1985 157.9 — — — — +19 -93 -250 68.0% +1.08 13–2 (87%) 13–9 (59%) — -0.49
24 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.43 1986 1885 145.4 — — — — +120 -20 -181 66.4% +1.02 5–3 (63%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.55
25 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) — +2.71 1987 1958 154.5 — — — — +45 -135 -122 63.2% +0.87 7–4 (64%) 12–8 (60%) — -1.77
26 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.94 1988 1808 142.3 — — — — +80 -39 — 60.9% +1.07 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) — +2.10
27 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) — -0.55 1989 1801 148.1 — — — — +45 — — 55.4% +0.54 7–2 (78%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.19
28 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.60 1990 1822 133.4 — — — — +14 -52 — 54.4% +0.37 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) — -1.58
29 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.07 1991 1766 147.3 +0.68 +2.12 1.091 51.7% +35 -54 +7 57.0% +0.70 3–7 (30%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.34
30 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.16 1992 1595 132.0 -0.48 +1.16 1.001 49.9% +89 +37 +164 41.7% -0.26 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.76
31 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.42 1993 1625 140.3 +1.01 +2.99 1.114 51.5% +120 -63 +81 46.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 2–8 (20%) — -0.52
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1654 131.8 +1.07 +2.40 1.155 52.4% +69 — — 53.6% +0.38 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — +1.27
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1644 128.0 +0.67 -1.30 0.943 48.9% +19 — +48 42.9% -0.31 5–5 (50%) 5–7 (42%) — -1.68
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1529 102.5 -0.73 +0.22 0.927 48.3% +70 — — 19.0% -1.95 0–1 0–2 — +0.50
42 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06 — 2061 154.2 +0.55 +1.43 1.053 50.8% +44 -64 -87 58.1% +0.62 84–59 (59%) 88–83 (51%) 101.6 -0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.