H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Andrea Gaudenzi H2H: 6-4

Thomas Muster holds a 6–4 lead over Andrea Gaudenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 4–3 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Gaudenzi won the 1996 St. Poelten quarterfinal W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
6 – 4
10 main draw meetings
Andrea Gaudenzi
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Gaudenzi #34 (w/o) Thomas Muster #2 Match data May 25, 1996* QF St. Poelten World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Thomas Muster #1 7-6(4) 6-4 Andrea Gaudenzi #36 Match data Apr 14, 1996* F Estoril Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Andrea Gaudenzi #35 6-3 6-4 Thomas Muster #2 Match data Feb 29, 1996* R32 Milan Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Thomas Muster #3 6-3 6-3 Andrea Gaudenzi #22 Match data Jan 5, 1996* R16 Qatar Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Thomas Muster #3 6-2 6-0 Andrea Gaudenzi #25 Match data Aug 13, 1995* F San Marino ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Thomas Muster #13 6-3 7-6(5) Andrea Gaudenzi #20 Match data Apr 30, 1995* SF Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Thomas Muster #18 6-2 5-1 (ret.) Andrea Gaudenzi #19 Match data Feb 23, 1995* R32 Stuttgart Indoor ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Andrea Gaudenzi #45 4-1 (ret.) Thomas Muster #10 Match data May 14, 1994* R16 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Andrea Gaudenzi #60 6-0 4-6 6-3 Thomas Muster #11 Match data Apr 7, 1994* R32 Barcelona Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Thomas Muster #12 7-5 6-0 Andrea Gaudenzi #82 Match data Oct 2, 1993* SF Palermo ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44
Andrea Gaudenzi #1,441 #18 1,522 1,867 206 221 48.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Andrea Gaudenzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #861 1,489 0 0
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0 1991 0–3 0.0% #632 1,456 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1993 17–10 63.0% #60 1,670 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5 1994 36–29 55.4% #24 1,775 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5 1995 31–25 55.4% #22 1,682 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8 1996 26–27 49.1% #55 1,657 0 0
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1997 14–20 41.2% #57 1,641 0 0
24 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13 1998 30–24 55.6% #44 1,678 0 1
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1999 13–14 48.1% #84 1,646 0 1
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23 2000 8–16 33.3% #101 1,591 0 1
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35 2001 17–19 47.2% #54 1,694 0 3
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42 2002 11–26 29.7% #120 1,534 0 3
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44 2003 3–7 30.0% #293 1,533 0 3
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44 — — — — — — —
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44 — — — — — — —
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Muster Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 2 1 3 66.7% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 22 15 37 59.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1996 9 11 20 45.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1998 6 12 18 33.3% 24 12 36 66.7% — — — — — — — —
25 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 13 13 26 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 2001 2 10 12 16.7% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
28 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 2002 3 9 12 25.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1% — 41 70 111 36.9% 155 123 278 55.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 9 19 28 32.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 527/612 of Thomas Muster's and 376/426 of Andrea Gaudenzi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Muster Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 3/3 1.3 3.7 72.4% 59.4% 28.8% 53.3% 20.8% 51.6% 32.3%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 25/27 1.8 2.4 68.8% 67.1% 47.0% 54.4% 53.6% 61.2% 41.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 59/65 2.2 2.9 66.5% 66.0% 50.2% 58.4% 37.6% 60.5% 40.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 55/56 1.5 2.8 60.6% 69.1% 48.6% 60.9% 40.7% 61.2% 40.8%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 43/53 1.7 3.3 63.5% 64.8% 50.7% 56.2% 40.2% 59.6% 40.9%
23 1991 42/48 1.0 1.5 73.3% 62.9% 51.5% 61.3% 49.1% 59.6% 44.0% 1997 29/34 2.0 3.4 61.2% 65.4% 46.0% 48.8% 47.4% 57.6% 40.3%
24 1992 52/62 2.0 1.9 66.2% 66.6% 53.3% 60.0% 44.4% 61.5% 40.7% 1998 42/54 2.6 3.8 62.4% 67.5% 48.5% 47.2% 44.2% 60.0% 38.5%
25 1993 92/98 2.8 2.5 61.6% 71.7% 57.7% 62.0% 46.4% 66.1% 43.4% 1999 23/27 1.7 2.5 64.8% 62.9% 47.7% 60.5% 45.1% 57.2% 40.4%
26 1994 68/80 4.0 3.5 58.1% 71.4% 54.0% 56.3% 46.4% 63.9% 41.8% 2000 21/24 3.8 3.7 57.8% 65.2% 48.1% 52.5% 41.8% 57.6% 39.1%
27 1995 86/101 3.1 2.5 59.5% 71.9% 54.7% 56.6% 54.3% 64.8% 45.6% 2001 30/36 4.2 3.9 54.9% 69.8% 51.7% 54.4% 39.2% 61.5% 38.3%
28 1996 71/86 3.2 2.3 59.3% 72.1% 53.3% 67.9% 45.7% 64.4% 43.4% 2002 36/37 3.3 4.8 53.2% 69.3% 46.2% 51.8% 42.1% 58.3% 37.0%
29 1997 57/66 4.2 2.3 56.8% 73.4% 53.1% 65.8% 49.9% 64.4% 38.4% 2003 10/10 2.3 3.8 58.1% 65.9% 45.7% 49.0% 35.4% 57.0% 34.8%
30 1998 44/52 3.0 2.1 59.0% 69.3% 52.9% 59.8% 46.5% 62.1% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 12/16 2.7 2.9 61.9% 62.8% 52.0% 61.2% 27.2% 58.1% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.6% 62.5% 61.5% 66.7% — 62.1% 21.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 2/2 3.0 3.0 60.5% 55.9% 29.0% 35.3% 29.2% 45.6% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 527/858 3.0 2.4 61.2% 70.2% 54.1% 61.0% 47.4% 63.6% 42.3% — 376/427 2.4 3.3 61.6% 66.8% 48.5% 54.8% 42.0% 59.6% 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Muster Andrea Gaudenzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24 1990 1489 101.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.03
17 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 1991 1456 97.8 -1.84 -2.41 0.666 42.1% — +45 — 14.3% -2.71 0–1 — — +0.18
18 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.14 1993 1670 138.3 +0.72 +0.59 1.074 51.5% -107 +47 — 61.9% +0.75 6–5 (55%) 8–2 (80%) — +0.33
20 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.96 1994 1775 146.5 -0.33 +2.81 1.032 50.5% -85 +58 -229 50.0% +0.09 13–5 (72%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.78
21 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.55 1995 1683 147.0 +0.24 +2.23 1.049 50.7% +5 +132 — 54.1% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.04
22 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.89 1996 1657 140.7 -1.41 +2.12 1.013 50.2% +8 +119 -108 49.2% +0.03 7–10 (41%) 10–9 (53%) — +0.03
23 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.44 1997 1641 129.7 -2.44 +1.67 0.950 49.0% -36 +61 — 46.2% -0.30 4–6 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — -1.16
24 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.43 1998 1678 136.1 -0.82 +0.58 0.964 49.2% -115 +126 — 51.4% +0.14 15–6 (71%) 7–9 (44%) — +1.21
25 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) — +2.71 1999 1646 124.2 -2.64 +0.64 0.944 48.8% — +88 — 45.6% -0.29 5–3 (63%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.59
26 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.94 2000 1592 119.8 -2.54 +0.58 0.923 48.4% -48 +48 — 39.4% -0.48 3–8 (27%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.05
27 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) — -0.55 2001 1694 133.8 +0.11 -0.18 0.993 49.3% -182 +106 — 52.5% -0.26 2–5 (29%) 10–5 (67%) — -2.07
28 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.60 2002 1534 124.9 -2.65 -0.09 0.889 47.7% -44 +117 — 34.4% -0.82 4–4 (50%) 5–10 (33%) — -0.26
29 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.07 2003 1533 118.0 -2.25 -2.03 0.810 45.9% -48 +99 — 34.6% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06 — 1868 141.8 -1.03 +1.22 0.982 49.5% -63 +93 -160 48.2% -0.11 69–62 (53%) 67–63 (52%) 105.4 -1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.