H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Andrei Cherkasov H2H: 5-0

Thomas Muster holds a 5–0 lead over Andrei Cherkasov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 4–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1995 Barcelona third round 6-3 6-2.

AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 0
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 13, 1995* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Thomas Muster #17 6-3 6-2 Andrei Cherkasov #280 Match data
May 25, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Thomas Muster #11 6-0 7-5 6-1 Andrei Cherkasov #60 Match data
May 11, 1994* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Thomas Muster #10 6-4 6-2 Andrei Cherkasov #48 Match data
Jan 14, 1993* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Muster #18 6-4 6-2 Andrei Cherkasov #28 Match data
Jul 25, 1991* Hilversum ATP 250 R32 Clay Thomas Muster #66 6-3 6-3 Andrei Cherkasov #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Andrei Cherkasov #1,174 #13 1,320 1,897 170 198 46.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Andrei Cherkasov
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #236 1,497 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 1989 13–16 44.8% #82 1,572 0 0
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1990 35–26 57.4% #21 1,877 0 1
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1991 37–29 56.1% #21 1,815 0 2
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1992 29–29 50.0% #32 1,711 0 2
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1993 34–31 52.3% #37 1,753 0 2
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1994 8–27 22.9% #172 1,554 0 2
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1995 2–5 28.6% #184 1,535 0 2
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1996 3–12 20.0% #133 1,463 0 2
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1997 5–10 33.3% #164 1,485 0 2
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 1998 0–3 0.0% #164 1,462 0 2
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1999 3–6 33.3% #217 1,483 0 2
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 2000 1–3 25.0% #198 1,452 0 2
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44