H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 0-1

Balazs Taroczy holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Muster in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Balazs Taroczy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1985 Roland Garros round of 128 7-5 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Balazs Taroczy
HUN Age 72 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Balazs Taroczy #46 7-5 6-3 7-5 Thomas Muster #188 Match data May 29, 1985* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44
Balazs Taroczy #732 #12 0 2,002 381 229 62.5% 0 0 0 0 13 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Balazs Taroczy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1 1972 4–3 57.1% — 1,564 0 0
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1973 3–5 37.5% #193 1,554 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5 1974 21–12 63.6% #38 1,771 0 1
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5 1975 17–16 51.5% #69 1,822 0 1
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8 1976 37–20 64.9% #31 1,849 0 2
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1977 38–23 62.3% #31 1,852 0 2
24 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13 1978 44–18 71.0% #20 1,908 0 4
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1979 41–22 65.1% #42 1,814 0 6
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23 1980 46–16 74.2% #22 1,930 0 9
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35 1981 45–17 72.6% #15 1,939 0 11
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42 1982 43–24 64.2% #27 1,864 0 13
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44 1983 13–14 48.1% #52 1,783 0 13
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44 1984 18–20 47.4% #43 1,751 0 13
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44 1985 9–17 34.6% #157 1,645 0 13
32 — — — — — — — 1986 2–2 50.0% #382 1,642 0 13
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Muster Balazs Taroczy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
19 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
22 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 29 14 43 67.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1977 3 4 7 42.9% 29 16 45 64.4% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
24 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1978 7 3 10 70.0% 33 10 43 76.7% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 32 13 45 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1980 5 2 7 71.4% 37 9 46 80.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 40 12 52 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 1982 2 1 3 66.7% 31 15 46 67.4% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6%
29 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1983 — — — — 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
30 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 6 9 15 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
42 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1% — 38 35 73 52.1% 286 134 420 68.1% 14 13 27 51.9% 43 47 90 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Muster Balazs Taroczy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.90 1972 1565 121.5 — — — — — +57 — 52.6% +0.16 — 0–1 — +0.47
19 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.14 1973 1554 107.9 — — — — — +43 -20 38.9% -0.61 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.06
20 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.96 1974 1771 134.2 — — — — -88 +24 -193 59.8% +0.47 6–6 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — +2.47
21 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.55 1975 1822 144.6 — — — — -131 +46 — 52.8% -0.04 2–3 (40%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.56
22 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.89 1976 1849 144.3 — — — — -88 +40 — 59.9% +0.80 12–6 (67%) 5–7 (42%) — +1.42
23 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.44 1977 1853 149.0 — — — — -90 +29 — 60.8% +0.85 7–10 (41%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.51
24 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.43 1978 1908 153.4 — — — — -103 +93 — 65.6% +1.25 14–8 (64%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.19
25 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) — +2.71 1979 1814 149.3 — — — — -60 +157 -208 60.4% +0.93 12–7 (63%) 6–8 (43%) — +1.25
26 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.94 1980 1931 156.3 — — — — -176 +80 -225 69.6% +1.32 9–6 (60%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.18
27 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) — -0.55 1981 1940 157.8 — — — — -191 +103 -216 67.1% +1.22 11–6 (65%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.14
28 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.60 1982 1864 151.2 — — — — -49 +58 — 58.3% +0.42 19–8 (70%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.65
29 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.07 1983 1784 148.0 — — — — +17 +44 — 46.9% +0.09 4–4 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.31
30 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.16 1984 1751 140.2 — — — — -22 +109 — 49.0% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 7–12 (37%) — -1.48
31 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.42 1985 1645 133.7 — — — — +37 +90 — 40.0% -0.42 3–4 (43%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1643 107.5 — — — — — +109 — 40.0% -0.40 2–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.18
42 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06 — 2002 154.5 — — — — -76 +76 -183 59.2% +0.68 108–73 (60%) 86–93 (48%) 99.3 +0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.