H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Thomas Muster vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 0-1
Balazs Taroczy holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Muster in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Balazs Taroczy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1985 Roland Garros first round 7-5 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1985* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 7-5 6-3 7-5 | Thomas Muster | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | #1,092 | #1 | 4,474 | 2,161 | 590 | 267 | 68.8% | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 44 |
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Muster | Balazs Taroczy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #16 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #18 | 1,793 | 0 | 13 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1993 | 77–21 | 78.6% | #9 | 1,953 | 0 | 20 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1994 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 23 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1995 | 84–17 | 83.2% | #3 | 1,990 | 1 | 35 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1996 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #5 | 1,915 | 1 | 42 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 1997 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #9 | 1,820 | 1 | 44 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 1998 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,800 | 1 | 44 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #189 | 1,674 | 1 | 44 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 |
| 42 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,655 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1075 | 1,608 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |