H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Bernd Karbacher H2H: 4-1

Thomas Muster holds a 4–1 lead over Bernd Karbacher in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1995 Stuttgart Open round of 16 6-4 6-2.

AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
GER Age 58 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Muster #4 6-4 6-2 Bernd Karbacher #34 Match data Jul 21, 1995* R16 Stuttgart Open ATP Championship Series modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Thomas Muster #13 6-2 6-2 Bernd Karbacher #22 Match data Apr 27, 1995* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Thomas Muster #18 6-4 6-2 Bernd Karbacher #25 Match data Mar 8, 1995* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Bernd Karbacher #82 6-3 6-3 Thomas Muster #16 Match data Sep 19, 1992* QF Geneva Open ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Thomas Muster #22 3-6 6-1 6-3 Bernd Karbacher #111 Match data Jul 18, 1992* QF Stuttgart Open ATP Championship Series modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44
Bernd Karbacher #730 #22 1,177 1,848 133 157 45.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Bernd Karbacher
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% 1,533 0 0
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1991 0–1 0.0% #223 1,494 0 0
24 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13 1992 16–14 53.3% #52 1,683 0 1
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1993 18–28 39.1% #57 1,621 0 1
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23 1994 32–25 56.1% #26 1,740 0 2
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35 1995 25–26 49.0% #39 1,719 0 2
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42 1996 19–25 43.2% #57 1,734 0 2
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44 1997 5–11 31.2% #217 1,613 0 2
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44 1998 5–8 38.5% #125 1,588 0 2
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44 1999 13–17 43.3% #117 1,567 0 2
32 2000 0–2 0.0% #637 1,531 0 2
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Muster Bernd Karbacher
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3%
18 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% 5 2 7 71.4%
21 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 3 5 8 37.5% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 6 9 15 40.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0%
26 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 19 10 29 65.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 1995 10 10 20 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
28 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 1996 8 13 21 38.1% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
31 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
42 2010 0 1 1 0.0%
43 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1% 51 64 115 44.3% 75 65 140 53.6% 4 13 17 23.5% 3 15 18 16.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 527/612 of Thomas Muster's and 254/290 of Bernd Karbacher's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Muster Bernd Karbacher
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 1991 42/48 1.0 1.5 73.3% 62.9% 51.5% 61.3% 49.1% 59.6% 44.0% 1991 1/1 3.0 0.0 52.2% 91.4% 34.4% 60.0% 33.3% 64.2% 23.1%
24 1992 52/62 2.0 1.9 66.2% 66.6% 53.3% 60.0% 44.4% 61.5% 40.7% 1992 29/30 5.2 3.2 51.4% 69.0% 50.5% 61.5% 37.8% 60.2% 38.3%
25 1993 92/98 2.8 2.5 61.6% 71.7% 57.7% 62.0% 46.4% 66.1% 43.4% 1993 43/46 5.3 3.9 51.3% 69.1% 48.8% 56.0% 44.2% 59.3% 37.1%
26 1994 68/80 4.0 3.5 58.1% 71.4% 54.0% 56.3% 46.4% 63.9% 41.8% 1994 49/57 4.8 2.7 53.2% 70.3% 50.5% 59.9% 43.6% 61.1% 38.7%
27 1995 86/101 3.1 2.5 59.5% 71.9% 54.7% 56.6% 54.3% 64.8% 45.6% 1995 44/51 5.3 3.0 52.4% 71.6% 47.2% 53.4% 42.8% 59.9% 38.9%
28 1996 71/86 3.2 2.3 59.3% 72.1% 53.3% 67.9% 45.7% 64.4% 43.4% 1996 37/44 5.6 2.1 56.5% 69.1% 48.7% 57.8% 42.4% 60.2% 38.1%
29 1997 57/66 4.2 2.3 56.8% 73.4% 53.1% 65.8% 49.9% 64.4% 38.4% 1997 10/16 3.9 3.6 51.3% 68.5% 48.6% 52.6% 26.2% 59.1% 38.2%
30 1998 44/52 3.0 2.1 59.0% 69.3% 52.9% 59.8% 46.5% 62.1% 40.5% 1998 11/13 6.5 2.8 57.6% 68.8% 45.5% 50.4% 33.7% 58.6% 40.9%
31 1999 12/16 2.7 2.9 61.9% 62.8% 52.0% 61.2% 27.2% 58.1% 34.2% 1999 28/30 6.5 3.0 55.8% 70.0% 48.8% 55.4% 38.3% 60.1% 37.1%
32 —/— 2000 2/2 2.5 3.5 57.0% 65.3% 37.0% 62.6% 16.7% 53.4% 27.1%
42 2010 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.6% 62.5% 61.5% 66.7% 62.1% 21.8% —/—
43 2011 2/2 3.0 3.0 60.5% 55.9% 29.0% 35.3% 29.2% 45.6% 35.9% —/—
Career 527/858 3.0 2.4 61.2% 70.2% 54.1% 61.0% 47.4% 63.6% 42.3% 254/290 5.3 3.0 53.4% 69.9% 48.7% 56.8% 40.8% 60.0% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Muster Bernd Karbacher
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1533 117.1 50.0% +0.50 -0.24
17 1985 1612 126.8 +22 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) +0.07
18 1986 1741 147.7 -223 +71 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) -1.90
19 1987 1754 137.1 -95 +27 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) -0.14
20 1988 1916 160.0 -207 +120 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) -1.96
21 1989 1868 141.2 -42 +130 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) +0.55
22 1990 1862 152.4 -32 +106 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) +0.89
23 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) -0.44 1991 1494 103.5 +0.37 -0.91 0.644 43.9% 0.0% -1.50 0–1 -0.12
24 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) +0.43 1992 1683 135.4 -0.27 +0.14 0.962 49.4% -122 +18 51.3% -0.06 8–7 (53%) 7–4 (64%) -0.91
25 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) +2.71 1993 1622 132.4 -1.39 -0.50 0.910 48.5% -59 +58 -21 41.9% -0.49 8–9 (47%) 10–6 (63%) -0.96
26 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) +0.94 1994 1740 133.6 +0.31 -0.17 0.995 50.0% -82 +37 -139 52.4% +0.01 14–6 (70%) 19–5 (79%) +1.11
27 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) -0.55 1995 1719 145.1 -0.88 +1.48 0.970 49.6% -42 +80 -127 47.2% -0.07 9–6 (60%) 5–9 (36%) -0.95
28 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) +1.60 1996 1734 142.0 -1.29 +1.16 0.957 49.2% -65 +86 49.1% -0.06 5–9 (36%) 2–9 (18%) -2.10
29 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) -0.07 1997 1613 107.0 -1.21 -0.22 0.933 48.2% +7 +145 36.8% -1.05 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) +0.24
30 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) -1.16 1998 1589 124.0 -1.56 +0.38 0.986 49.7% +34 +112 41.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) -0.33
31 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) -1.42 1999 1567 131.4 -1.03 -0.83 0.932 48.9% +57 +119 44.2% -0.26 4–6 (40%) 7–8 (47%) +0.13
32 2000 1532 100.1 -1.21 -1.97 0.580 41.9% 0.0% -3.40 +0.14
42 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% 0.0% -2.50 0–1 +0.12
43 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% 0.0% -4.00 +0.06
Career 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06 1849 140.2 -0.78 +0.22 0.952 49.2% -41 +67 -96 46.5% -0.25 50–48 (51%) 56–46 (55%) 107.5 -1.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.