H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Cassio Motta H2H: 1-1

Thomas Muster and Cassio Motta are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on clay, while Cassio Motta leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1992 Roland Garros round of 128 6-4 6-4 5-7 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Cassio Motta
BRA Age 66 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Muster #22 6-4 6-4 5-7 6-2 Cassio Motta #247 Match data May 27, 1992* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Cassio Motta #122 7-6 6-2 Thomas Muster #20 Match data Nov 23, 1989* R32 Itaparica ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44
Cassio Motta #576 #48 352 1,739 105 164 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Cassio Motta
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1979 4–8 33.3% #109 1,485 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5 1980 0–7 0.0% #255 1,439 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5 1981 1–3 25.0% — 1,451 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8 1982 8–13 38.1% #86 1,540 0 0
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1983 14–21 40.0% #79 1,678 0 0
24 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13 1984 12–19 38.7% #107 1,617 0 0
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1985 7–11 38.9% #136 1,626 0 0
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23 1986 10–10 50.0% #49 1,667 0 0
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35 1987 12–17 41.4% #122 1,628 0 0
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42 1988 7–9 43.8% #74 1,593 0 0
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44 1989 13–16 44.8% #134 1,559 0 0
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44 1990 10–16 38.5% #105 1,538 0 0
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44 1991 2–8 20.0% #216 1,475 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1992 5–5 50.0% #198 1,532 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #693 1,519 0 0
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Muster Cassio Motta
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 5 11 16 31.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1984 1 10 11 9.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1986 3 4 7 42.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
29 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 5 4 9 55.6% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
42 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1% — 33 50 83 39.8% 55 89 144 38.2% 8 12 20 40.0% 9 13 22 40.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 527/612 of Thomas Muster's and 18/20 of Cassio Motta's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Muster Cassio Motta
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 1991 42/48 1.0 1.5 73.3% 62.9% 51.5% 61.3% 49.1% 59.6% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1992 52/62 2.0 1.9 66.2% 66.6% 53.3% 60.0% 44.4% 61.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 92/98 2.8 2.5 61.6% 71.7% 57.7% 62.0% 46.4% 66.1% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 68/80 4.0 3.5 58.1% 71.4% 54.0% 56.3% 46.4% 63.9% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1995 86/101 3.1 2.5 59.5% 71.9% 54.7% 56.6% 54.3% 64.8% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1996 71/86 3.2 2.3 59.3% 72.1% 53.3% 67.9% 45.7% 64.4% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1997 57/66 4.2 2.3 56.8% 73.4% 53.1% 65.8% 49.9% 64.4% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 44/52 3.0 2.1 59.0% 69.3% 52.9% 59.8% 46.5% 62.1% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 12/16 2.7 2.9 61.9% 62.8% 52.0% 61.2% 27.2% 58.1% 34.2% 1991 10/10 2.1 2.0 64.3% 62.8% 43.5% 51.2% 30.6% 55.2% 33.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 8/10 4.1 3.0 64.8% 68.3% 47.9% 63.3% 39.5% 61.2% 37.1%
42 2010 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.6% 62.5% 61.5% 66.7% — 62.1% 21.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 2/2 3.0 3.0 60.5% 55.9% 29.0% 35.3% 29.2% 45.6% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 527/858 3.0 2.4 61.2% 70.2% 54.1% 61.0% 47.4% 63.6% 42.3% — 18/269 3.0 2.4 64.5% 65.3% 45.4% 56.6% 34.5% 57.8% 34.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Muster Cassio Motta
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.14 1979 1486 110.0 — — — — — +33 — 35.5% -1.26 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.65
20 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.96 1980 1440 106.6 — — — — — +18 — 16.7% -1.78 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.30
21 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.55 1981 1452 118.5 — — — — — +22 — 33.3% -1.17 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.11
22 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.89 1982 1541 132.3 — — — — — +34 — 45.2% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.01
23 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.44 1983 1678 136.4 — — — — -92 -123 -42 42.9% -0.93 6–9 (40%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.25
24 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.43 1984 1618 130.0 — — — — -81 +2 +67 45.1% -0.33 2–7 (22%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.17
25 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) — +2.71 1985 1626 134.0 — — — — -100 +47 — 44.2% -0.62 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.73
26 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.94 1986 1668 121.5 — — — — -132 +54 — 49.0% -0.16 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.30
27 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) — -0.55 1987 1629 126.7 — — — — -92 +60 — 40.5% -0.66 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.39
28 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.60 1988 1593 113.2 — — — — -18 +31 — 48.8% -0.22 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.41
29 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.07 1989 1560 115.7 — — — — -7 +46 — 46.7% -0.29 4–6 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +2.16
30 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.16 1990 1538 112.9 — — — — +42 +29 — 35.6% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.44
31 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.42 1991 1476 100.3 -2.73 -2.51 0.741 44.1% +36 +93 — 22.7% -2.05 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.60
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1533 108.7 +0.71 -1.64 0.955 50.1% +8 +23 — 45.5% -0.36 1–1 1–1 — +0.41
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1520 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.03
42 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06 — 1740 130.1 -1.20 -2.12 0.828 46.8% -43 +21 +8 41.9% -0.65 37–55 (40%) 31–45 (41%) 96.4 +0.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.