H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 6-2

Thomas Muster holds a 6–2 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 5–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1998 Boston quarterfinal 7-5 6-3.

AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 29, 1998* Boston ATP 250 QF Hard Cedric Pioline #17 7-5 6-3 Thomas Muster #24 Match data
Mar 12, 1998* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Thomas Muster #20 4-6 6-3 6-4 Cedric Pioline #16 Match data
Apr 18, 1997* Barcelona ATP 250 R16 Clay Cedric Pioline #34 7-6(4) 6-4 Thomas Muster #2 Match data
Apr 28, 1996* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Thomas Muster #2 6-3 6-3 Cedric Pioline #29 Match data
Sep 15, 1995* Bucharest ATP 250 R16 Clay Thomas Muster #3 7-5 6-3 Cedric Pioline #58 Match data
Jun 2, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Thomas Muster #5 6-1 6-3 6-3 Cedric Pioline #58 Match data
May 28, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Thomas Muster #16 7-6 2-6 6-4 6-2 Cedric Pioline #21 Match data
Jun 22, 1991* Genova ATP 250 QF Clay Thomas Muster #83 4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 Cedric Pioline #92 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44