H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 3-4

Fabrice Santoro holds a 4–3 lead over Thomas Muster in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Fabrice Santoro leads 3–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1997 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-3 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 1997* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Thomas Muster #4 6-3 5-7 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #43 Match data
Aug 2, 1997* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Fabrice Santoro #50 6-2 2-6 6-4 Thomas Muster #5 Match data
Apr 24, 1997* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Fabrice Santoro #90 6-2 7-6(3) Thomas Muster #2 Match data
Aug 6, 1994* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 SF Clay Fabrice Santoro #115 2-6 7-6(6) 7-6(4) Thomas Muster #12 Match data
Jun 18, 1992* Genova ATP 250 R32 Clay Fabrice Santoro #57 6-4 6-1 Thomas Muster #19 Match data
Jun 15, 1991* Florence ATP 250 QF Clay Thomas Muster #116 6-7(4) 6-1 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #44 Match data
Apr 6, 1990* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Thomas Muster #22 7-6 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #138 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —