H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Thomas Muster vs Franco Davin H2H: 5-0
Thomas Muster holds a 5–0 lead over Franco Davin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 5–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1995 Estoril fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5
–
0
5 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1995* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thomas Muster | 7-5 6-1 | Franco Davin | Match data |
| Jul 22, 1994* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thomas Muster | 6-2 6-3 | Franco Davin | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1993* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thomas Muster | 6-2 6-0 | Franco Davin | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1992* | Umag | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Thomas Muster | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | Franco Davin | Match data |
| May 7, 1987* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thomas Muster | 1-6 6-2 6-0 | Franco Davin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | #1,092 | #1 | 4,474 | 2,161 | 590 | 267 | 68.8% | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 44 |
| Franco Davin | #960 | #30 | 774 | 1,852 | 153 | 152 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Muster | Franco Davin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #508 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #166 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #94 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #73 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #16 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #35 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1989 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #112 | 1,711 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1990 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #46 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #103 | 1,543 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #18 | 1,793 | 0 | 13 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #61 | 1,612 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1993 | 77–21 | 78.6% | #9 | 1,953 | 0 | 20 | 1995 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #248 | 1,550 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1994 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 23 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1995 | 84–17 | 83.2% | #3 | 1,990 | 1 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #5 | 1,915 | 1 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1997 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #9 | 1,820 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,800 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #189 | 1,674 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,655 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1075 | 1,608 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |