H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Grant Stafford H2H: 3-2

Thomas Muster holds a 3–2 lead over Grant Stafford in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Grant Stafford leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1997 Miami Masters second round 6-4 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Grant Stafford
RSA Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 19, 1997* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Thomas Muster #2 6-4 2-6 6-1 Grant Stafford #69 Match data
Jan 17, 1997* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Thomas Muster #5 6-3 6-2 6-2 Grant Stafford #78 Match data
Jan 7, 1994* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Grant Stafford #86 7-6(3) 4-6 6-4 Thomas Muster #9 Match data
Mar 4, 1993* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Thomas Muster #14 6-4 6-4 Grant Stafford #172 Match data
Jun 24, 1992* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Grant Stafford #162 6-3 6-3 7-6(6) Thomas Muster #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Grant Stafford #1,161 #53 750 1,799 83 111 42.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Grant Stafford
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1990 0–1 0.0% #264 1,492 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1991 5–6 45.5% #172 1,553 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1992 4–4 50.0% #191 1,636 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1993 17–14 54.8% #86 1,707 0 0
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1994 11–21 34.4% #168 1,555 0 0
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1995 2–7 22.2% #288 1,527 0 0
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1996 10–13 43.5% #83 1,562 0 0
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1997 21–20 51.2% #74 1,655 0 0
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 1998 12–21 36.4% #163 1,563 0 0
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1999 0–3 0.0% #475 1,534 0 0
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 2000 1–1 50.0% #435 1,591 0 0
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 — — — — — — —
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44 — — — — — — —
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —