H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 1-1

Thomas Muster and Hicham Arazi are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on carpet, while Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1997 Vienna Open round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Hicham Arazi
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Muster #12 6-2 6-2 Hicham Arazi #37 Match data Oct 9, 1997* R32 Vienna Open Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet
Hicham Arazi #54 6-1 6-2 Thomas Muster #3 Match data May 10, 1997* R16 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 215 48.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Hicham Arazi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8 1996 12–17 41.4% #79 1,546 0 0
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1
24 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,715 0 1
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44 2004 15–18 45.5% #62 1,701 0 1
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,664 0 1
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Muster Hicham Arazi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1996 5 9 14 35.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 19 14 33 57.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
25 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2000 17 15 32 53.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 2001 12 9 21 57.1% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 2002 10 8 18 55.6% 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2003 7 8 15 46.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
42 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1% — 80 87 167 47.9% 77 84 161 47.8% 18 17 35 51.4% 27 27 54 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 527/612 of Thomas Muster's and 75/76 of Hicham Arazi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Muster Hicham Arazi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 1991 42/48 1.0 1.5 73.3% 62.9% 51.5% 61.3% 49.1% 59.6% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1992 52/62 2.0 1.9 66.2% 66.6% 53.3% 60.0% 44.4% 61.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 92/98 2.8 2.5 61.6% 71.7% 57.7% 62.0% 46.4% 66.1% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 68/80 4.0 3.5 58.1% 71.4% 54.0% 56.3% 46.4% 63.9% 41.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1995 86/101 3.1 2.5 59.5% 71.9% 54.7% 56.6% 54.3% 64.8% 45.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1996 71/86 3.2 2.3 59.3% 72.1% 53.3% 67.9% 45.7% 64.4% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1997 57/66 4.2 2.3 56.8% 73.4% 53.1% 65.8% 49.9% 64.4% 38.4% 2003 41/41 3.0 1.5 59.3% 69.4% 52.4% 58.2% 38.9% 62.5% 38.1%
30 1998 44/52 3.0 2.1 59.0% 69.3% 52.9% 59.8% 46.5% 62.1% 40.5% 2004 32/33 4.3 1.9 61.8% 67.8% 53.3% 59.6% 38.9% 62.3% 37.2%
31 1999 12/16 2.7 2.9 61.9% 62.8% 52.0% 61.2% 27.2% 58.1% 34.2% 2005 2/2 2.0 1.0 55.9% 59.0% 42.6% 50.6% 20.0% 51.4% 25.6%
42 2010 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.6% 62.5% 61.5% 66.7% — 62.1% 21.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 2/2 3.0 3.0 60.5% 55.9% 29.0% 35.3% 29.2% 45.6% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 527/858 3.0 2.4 61.2% 70.2% 54.1% 61.0% 47.4% 63.6% 42.3% — 75/417 3.5 1.7 60.3% 68.4% 52.5% 58.6% 38.4% 62.1% 37.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Muster Hicham Arazi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.96 1994 1487 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.09
21 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.55 1995 1457 106.7 — — — — +66 — — 29.4% -1.30 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.11
22 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.89 1996 1546 121.8 — — — — +2 -25 +68 41.3% -0.65 7–6 (54%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.69
23 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.44 1997 1625 136.9 — — — — -45 +82 -20 50.4% -0.07 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) — +0.56
24 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.43 1998 1716 146.6 — — — — -39 +16 -91 49.6% 0.00 5–11 (31%) 6–10 (38%) — -3.26
25 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) — +2.71 1999 1702 141.7 — — — — -21 +82 — 47.4% -0.41 9–5 (64%) 14–8 (64%) — -3.32
26 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.94 2000 1775 143.8 — — — — +25 -55 -150 53.7% +0.23 12–7 (63%) 5–10 (33%) — +0.15
27 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) — -0.55 2001 1834 144.1 — — — — +20 -121 -176 53.4% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.90
28 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.60 2002 1700 126.9 — — — — +97 -76 — 46.7% -0.31 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.75
29 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.07 2003 1718 135.5 -0.40 +1.29 1.017 50.1% +50 -87 -83 51.0% +0.17 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.03
30 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.16 2004 1702 135.1 -0.45 +0.35 0.986 49.8% +29 -110 +6 46.0% -0.25 3–6 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — -0.40
31 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.42 2005 1665 97.8 -2.62 -3.75 0.527 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.02
42 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06 — 1865 143.4 -0.48 +0.75 0.987 49.7% +14 -4 -63 48.9% -0.15 65–63 (51%) 79–72 (52%) 104.2 -1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.