H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Jaime Oncins H2H: 2-0

Thomas Muster holds a 2–0 lead over Jaime Oncins in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1993 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Jaime Oncins
BRA Age 56 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Muster #14 6-4 6-0 Jaime Oncins #41 Match data Mar 3, 1993* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Thomas Muster #17 6-4 6-2 Jaime Oncins #54 Match data Jul 24, 1992* R16 Austrian Open Kitzbühel ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44
Jaime Oncins #1,034 #34 773 1,810 64 87 42.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Jaime Oncins
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1 1988 1–2 33.3% #314 1,493 0 0
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1989 0–2 0.0% #263 1,470 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5 1990 0–4 0.0% #113 1,442 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5 1991 22–17 56.4% #64 1,677 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8 1992 27–19 58.7% #48 1,778 0 2
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1993 11–23 32.4% #133 1,584 0 2
24 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13 1994 1–7 12.5% #230 1,505 0 2
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1995 1–2 33.3% #222 1,508 0 2
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23 1996 0–2 0.0% #160 1,491 0 2
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35 1997 0–6 0.0% #166 1,439 0 2
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42 1998 1–2 33.3% #223 1,451 0 2
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44 — — — — — — —
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44 — — — — — — —
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44 2001 0–1 0.0% #1031 1,438 0 2
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Muster Jaime Oncins
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
21 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — — — — —
23 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 4 7 11 36.4% 7 15 22 31.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1% — 32 42 74 43.2% 30 39 69 43.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 527/612 of Thomas Muster's and 125/142 of Jaime Oncins's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Muster Jaime Oncins
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 35/39 3.2 2.6 55.4% 69.9% 50.1% 49.9% 43.4% 61.0% 41.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 42/46 3.0 3.8 55.5% 69.7% 45.7% 54.9% 43.5% 59.3% 42.8%
23 1991 42/48 1.0 1.5 73.3% 62.9% 51.5% 61.3% 49.1% 59.6% 44.0% 1993 29/34 2.9 4.4 58.2% 66.6% 40.7% 51.5% 42.1% 55.8% 40.6%
24 1992 52/62 2.0 1.9 66.2% 66.6% 53.3% 60.0% 44.4% 61.5% 40.7% 1994 6/8 2.2 9.0 57.5% 65.4% 40.9% 63.4% 41.9% 55.0% 39.7%
25 1993 92/98 2.8 2.5 61.6% 71.7% 57.7% 62.0% 46.4% 66.1% 43.4% 1995 3/3 3.0 5.3 60.8% 70.0% 43.9% 63.0% 24.5% 59.4% 39.6%
26 1994 68/80 4.0 3.5 58.1% 71.4% 54.0% 56.3% 46.4% 63.9% 41.8% 1996 2/2 1.5 18.5 45.0% 69.3% 28.9% 47.3% 28.6% 47.0% 43.5%
27 1995 86/101 3.1 2.5 59.5% 71.9% 54.7% 56.6% 54.3% 64.8% 45.6% 1997 6/6 3.0 9.7 51.8% 67.9% 35.1% 48.8% 61.9% 52.0% 35.0%
28 1996 71/86 3.2 2.3 59.3% 72.1% 53.3% 67.9% 45.7% 64.4% 43.4% 1998 1/3 4.0 8.0 57.7% 66.7% 31.8% 33.3% 33.3% 51.9% 35.1%
29 1997 57/66 4.2 2.3 56.8% 73.4% 53.1% 65.8% 49.9% 64.4% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 44/52 3.0 2.1 59.0% 69.3% 52.9% 59.8% 46.5% 62.1% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 12/16 2.7 2.9 61.9% 62.8% 52.0% 61.2% 27.2% 58.1% 34.2% 2001 1/1 3.0 13.0 56.5% 63.9% 46.8% 60.0% 50.0% 56.5% 39.3%
42 2010 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.6% 62.5% 61.5% 66.7% — 62.1% 21.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 2/2 3.0 3.0 60.5% 55.9% 29.0% 35.3% 29.2% 45.6% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 527/858 3.0 2.4 61.2% 70.2% 54.1% 61.0% 47.4% 63.6% 42.3% — 125/151 3.0 4.5 56.0% 68.7% 44.6% 52.8% 43.3% 58.1% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Muster Jaime Oncins
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.90 1988 1493 95.3 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.86 0–1 3–0 (100%) — +0.30
19 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.14 1989 1471 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.19
20 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.96 1990 1442 102.8 — — — — +19 — — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — -0.15
21 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.55 1991 1677 121.5 +0.13 +1.64 1.068 51.1% -83 -50 -66 55.6% +0.24 5–9 (36%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.89
22 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.89 1992 1778 131.6 -1.02 +2.52 1.052 50.9% -123 +21 — 58.1% +0.28 7–7 (50%) 11–3 (79%) — +1.08
23 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.44 1993 1584 130.7 -3.35 +1.16 0.920 48.2% +18 +63 — 39.3% -0.56 5–11 (31%) 2–9 (18%) — -0.21
24 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.43 1994 1506 104.0 -2.79 -0.18 0.883 47.5% +74 +44 — 36.4% -0.86 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.29
25 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) — +2.71 1995 1509 108.4 +0.94 -0.26 0.977 49.5% — +44 — 33.3% -0.50 — — — -0.02
26 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.94 1996 1491 108.9 +1.07 +2.59 0.821 45.2% — — — 28.6% -2.14 0–1 1–1 — -0.08
27 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) — -0.55 1997 1439 112.1 -3.40 -1.77 0.729 43.8% +88 +85 — 13.3% -1.93 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
28 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.60 1998 1451 107.4 -1.60 -1.30 0.730 43.1% +85 — — 33.3% -1.17 — 1–1 — -0.07
29 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.42 2001 1438 100.2 +0.01 -0.73 0.903 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
42 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06 — 1810 127.5 -1.35 +1.50 0.987 49.6% -49 +28 -66 47.0% -0.28 17–39 (30%) 23–23 (50%) 90.4 +1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.