H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Jakob Hlasek H2H: 4-2

Thomas Muster holds a 4–2 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 4–0 on clay, while Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1994 Sun City quarterfinal 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 2, 1994* Sun City ATP 250 QF Hard Jakob Hlasek #88 6-7(5) 6-4 6-2 Thomas Muster #11 Match data
May 12, 1993* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Thomas Muster #16 6-3 3-6 7-5 Jakob Hlasek #44 Match data
Nov 4, 1992* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Jakob Hlasek #48 6-3 6-4 Thomas Muster #18 Match data
May 16, 1990* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Thomas Muster #17 6-3 6-4 Jakob Hlasek #39 Match data
Jul 30, 1987* Hilversum ATP 250 R32 Clay Thomas Muster #44 6-1 0-6 7-6 Jakob Hlasek #25 Match data
Aug 3, 1986* Hilversum ATP 250 F Clay Thomas Muster #79 6-1 6-3 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Jakob Hlasek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —