H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 1-1

Thomas Muster and Jeff Tarango are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on clay, while Jeff Tarango leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1997 Roland Garros second round 7-5 1-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 30, 1997* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Thomas Muster #5 7-5 1-6 6-2 6-1 Jeff Tarango #74 Match data
Oct 17, 1992* Tel Aviv ATP 250 SF Hard Jeff Tarango #63 6-2 6-4 Thomas Muster #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —