H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomas Muster vs Jimmy Arias H2H: 2-0
Thomas Muster holds a 2–0 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1990 Adelaide final 3-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 1990* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Thomas Muster | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
| Jul 7, 1988* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thomas Muster | 6-4 3-6 7-6 | Jimmy Arias | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | #1,092 | #1 | 4,474 | 2,161 | 590 | 267 | 68.8% | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 44 |
| Jimmy Arias | #714 | #5 | 587 | 2,067 | 281 | 217 | 56.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Muster | Jimmy Arias | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #255 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #84 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,858 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,045 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1987 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1988 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #16 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1989 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #48 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1990 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #34 | 1,720 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 10 | 1988 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,615 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1992 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #18 | 1,793 | 0 | 13 | 1989 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1993 | 77–21 | 78.6% | #9 | 1,953 | 0 | 20 | 1990 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #60 | 1,681 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1994 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 23 | 1991 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,691 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1995 | 84–17 | 83.2% | #3 | 1,990 | 1 | 35 | 1992 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1996 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #5 | 1,915 | 1 | 42 | 1993 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #178 | 1,664 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1997 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #9 | 1,820 | 1 | 44 | 1994 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #334 | 1,638 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1998 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,800 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #189 | 1,674 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #711 | 1,640 | 0 | 5 |
| 42 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,655 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1075 | 1,608 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |