H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Thomas Muster vs Libor Pimek H2H: 1-1
Thomas Muster and Libor Pimek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1986 Monte Carlo second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 62
Right-Handed
195 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 1986* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Thomas Muster | 6-1 6-1 | Libor Pimek | Match data |
| Jul 22, 1985 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Libor Pimek | 6-1 6-3 | Thomas Muster | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | #1,092 | #1 | 4,474 | 2,161 | 590 | 267 | 68.8% | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 44 |
| Libor Pimek | #1,308 | #21 | 73 | 1,860 | 124 | 119 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Muster | Libor Pimek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #57 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #16 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #25 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #34 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 | 1986 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #71 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1992 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #18 | 1,793 | 0 | 13 | 1988 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #234 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1993 | 77–21 | 78.6% | #9 | 1,953 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1994 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1995 | 84–17 | 83.2% | #3 | 1,990 | 1 | 35 | 1991 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #332 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1996 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #5 | 1,915 | 1 | 42 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1997 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #9 | 1,820 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,800 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #189 | 1,674 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,655 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1075 | 1,608 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |