H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Marc Rosset H2H: 1-1

Thomas Muster and Marc Rosset are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Marc Rosset won the 1993 Rome Masters third round 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Marc Rosset
SUI Age 55 Right-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 13, 1993* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Marc Rosset #26 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 Thomas Muster #16 Match data
Jul 16, 1992* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 R32 Clay Thomas Muster #22 6-3 6-2 Marc Rosset #38 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Marc Rosset #1,490 #9 2,069 1,950 398 334 54.4% 0 0 0 0 14 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Marc Rosset
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #474 1,488 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 1989 7–2 77.8% #45 1,613 0 1
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1990 35–23 60.3% #22 1,811 0 2
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1991 18–28 39.1% #60 1,648 0 2
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1992 31–22 58.5% #35 1,826 0 3
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1993 46–21 68.7% #16 1,922 0 6
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1994 46–27 63.0% #14 1,925 0 8
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1995 38–21 64.4% #15 1,814 0 10
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1996 31–27 53.4% #22 1,771 0 10
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1997 32–31 50.8% #31 1,630 0 11
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 1998 27–27 50.0% #31 1,749 0 11
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1999 26–27 49.1% #45 1,658 0 12
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 2000 31–25 55.4% #28 1,723 0 14
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 2001 12–23 34.3% #119 1,601 0 14
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44 2002 8–12 40.0% #101 1,597 0 14
32 — — — — — — — 2003 6–9 40.0% #122 1,586 0 14
33 — — — — — — — 2004 4–8 33.3% #214 1,546 0 14
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —