H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Martin Jaite H2H: 3-3

Thomas Muster and Martin Jaite are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1990 Roland Garros round of 16 7-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Martin Jaite
ARG Age 61 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomas Muster #9 7-6 6-3 6-2 Martin Jaite #13 Match data Jun 6, 1990* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Thomas Muster #30 6-3 6-2 Martin Jaite #13 Match data Apr 26, 1990* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Thomas Muster #54 6-2 6-1 Martin Jaite #16 Match data May 11, 1988* R64 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Martin Jaite #15 6-2 3-6 7-6 6-0 Thomas Muster #52 Match data May 31, 1987* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Martin Jaite #18 6-2 6-4 Thomas Muster #45 Match data Apr 24, 1987* R16 Monte-Carlo Masters ATP 250 Clay
Martin Jaite #19 6-1 7-6 Thomas Muster #54 Match data Sep 12, 1986* R16 Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44
Martin Jaite #1,214 #10 1,226 1,965 275 158 63.5% 0 0 0 0 12 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Martin Jaite
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0 1982 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1 1983 4–3 57.1% #285 1,546 0 0
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1984 11–8 57.9% #56 1,678 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5 1985 37–17 68.5% #20 1,814 0 1
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5 1986 34–15 69.4% #17 1,828 0 3
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8 1987 43–17 71.7% #14 1,890 0 5
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1988 25–20 55.6% #54 1,741 0 5
24 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13 1989 46–14 76.7% #11 1,948 0 9
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1990 31–19 62.0% #36 1,768 0 11
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23 1991 24–21 53.3% #46 1,706 0 12
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35 1992 18–19 48.6% #120 1,681 0 12
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42 1993 1–4 20.0% #245 1,603 0 12
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44 — — — — — — —
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44 — — — — — — —
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44 — — — — — — —
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Muster Martin Jaite
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
19 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 — — — — 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — —
20 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 32 12 44 72.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 40 12 52 76.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 14 12 26 53.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 7 3 10 70.0% 29 9 38 76.3% — — — — 10 2 12 83.3%
25 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1992 9 7 16 56.3% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — — — — —
28 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 1993 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1% — 51 39 90 56.7% 208 106 314 66.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 12 27 55.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 527/612 of Thomas Muster's and 78/87 of Martin Jaite's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Muster Martin Jaite
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 1991 42/48 1.0 1.5 73.3% 62.9% 51.5% 61.3% 49.1% 59.6% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1992 52/62 2.0 1.9 66.2% 66.6% 53.3% 60.0% 44.4% 61.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 92/98 2.8 2.5 61.6% 71.7% 57.7% 62.0% 46.4% 66.1% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 68/80 4.0 3.5 58.1% 71.4% 54.0% 56.3% 46.4% 63.9% 41.8% 1991 40/45 4.4 2.3 52.5% 70.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.5% 61.0% 38.5%
27 1995 86/101 3.1 2.5 59.5% 71.9% 54.7% 56.6% 54.3% 64.8% 45.6% 1992 33/37 4.8 2.4 51.4% 68.9% 50.8% 51.3% 42.2% 59.8% 40.4%
28 1996 71/86 3.2 2.3 59.3% 72.1% 53.3% 67.9% 45.7% 64.4% 43.4% 1993 5/5 3.0 2.6 48.1% 65.3% 43.6% 36.3% 41.5% 54.3% 35.8%
29 1997 57/66 4.2 2.3 56.8% 73.4% 53.1% 65.8% 49.9% 64.4% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 44/52 3.0 2.1 59.0% 69.3% 52.9% 59.8% 46.5% 62.1% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 12/16 2.7 2.9 61.9% 62.8% 52.0% 61.2% 27.2% 58.1% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.6% 62.5% 61.5% 66.7% — 62.1% 21.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 2/2 3.0 3.0 60.5% 55.9% 29.0% 35.3% 29.2% 45.6% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 527/858 3.0 2.4 61.2% 70.2% 54.1% 61.0% 47.4% 63.6% 42.3% — 78/433 4.5 2.4 51.8% 69.6% 49.8% 51.7% 42.8% 60.1% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Muster Martin Jaite
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 1982 1505 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 — — +0.34
18 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.90 1983 1546 116.6 — — — — — +29 — 58.8% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.69
19 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.14 1984 1679 138.0 — — — — — +39 — 54.3% +0.20 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.05
20 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.96 1985 1814 148.5 — — — — -225 +124 — 65.7% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 10–1 (91%) — +1.02
21 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.55 1986 1829 149.1 — — — — — +104 — 62.5% +0.94 9–2 (82%) 5–3 (63%) — -1.18
22 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.89 1987 1891 153.1 — — — — -345 +124 — 66.7% +1.10 9–8 (53%) 12–8 (60%) — -0.79
23 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.44 1988 1741 143.8 — — — — -84 +115 — 56.7% +0.57 6–6 (50%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.19
24 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.43 1989 1948 147.5 — — — — -114 -9 — 69.3% +1.12 14–6 (70%) 11–7 (61%) — +0.50
25 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) — +2.71 1990 1768 136.5 — — — — -21 +142 — 58.3% +0.39 11–7 (61%) 11–6 (65%) — +1.68
26 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.94 1991 1707 146.0 +0.84 -0.20 0.987 49.8% -22 +147 — 47.7% 0.00 11–3 (79%) 6–11 (35%) — -3.34
27 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) — -0.55 1992 1682 122.5 -0.08 +0.48 1.004 50.2% -2 +24 — 46.1% -0.28 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) — 0.00
28 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.60 1993 1604 96.1 -2.34 -3.48 0.784 45.7% — +20 — 18.2% -1.73 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57
29 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06 — 1966 149.4 +0.25 -0.12 0.979 49.7% -87 +92 — 59.5% +0.61 80–50 (62%) 69–51 (58%) 107.8 -0.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.