H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Mats Wilander H2H: 0-2

Mats Wilander holds a 2–0 lead over Thomas Muster in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mats Wilander leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mats Wilander won the 1989 Stockholm fourth round 6-4 6-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 10, 1989* Stockholm ATP 250 R16 Carpet Mats Wilander #14 6-4 6-7 6-4 Thomas Muster #23 Match data
Apr 24, 1986* Monte Carlo ATP 250 R32 Clay Mats Wilander #3 6-2 6-2 Thomas Muster #129 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Mats Wilander
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 — — — — — — —
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —