H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Mikael Tillstrom H2H: 1-1

Thomas Muster and Mikael Tillstrom are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on clay, while Mikael Tillstrom leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mikael Tillstrom won the 1996 Australian Open round of 16 7-5 4-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Mikael Tillstrom
SWE Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mikael Tillstrom #105 7-5 4-6 6-3 6-2 Thomas Muster #3 Match data Jan 24, 1996* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Thomas Muster #37 6-3 4-6 6-3 Mikael Tillstrom #332 Match data Apr 26, 1992* QF Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44
Mikael Tillstrom #506 #39 966 1,833 109 109 50.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Mikael Tillstrom
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5 1992 7–4 63.6% #141 1,610 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5 1993 0–3 0.0% #438 1,564 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8 1994 4–2 66.7% #149 1,659 0 0
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1995 4–3 57.1% #116 1,700 0 0
24 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13 1996 24–19 55.8% #47 1,757 0 0
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1997 18–22 45.0% #68 1,644 0 1
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23 1998 20–21 48.8% #85 1,644 0 1
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35 1999 15–18 45.5% #79 1,685 0 1
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42 2000 17–17 50.0% #80 1,669 0 1
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44 — — — — — — —
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44 — — — — — — —
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44 — — — — — — —
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Muster Mikael Tillstrom
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1992 — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
21 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
23 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1996 13 9 22 59.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1997 15 15 30 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1998 12 8 20 60.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
27 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1999 10 9 19 52.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 2000 13 11 24 54.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1% — 65 53 118 55.1% 27 33 60 45.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 14 15 29 48.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 527/612 of Thomas Muster's and 191/218 of Mikael Tillstrom's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Muster Mikael Tillstrom
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 11/11 3.5 2.1 53.7% 68.0% 49.2% 45.2% 53.6% 59.3% 42.5%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 3/3 1.3 1.3 57.3% 53.6% 37.5% 49.4% 42.8% 47.1% 33.3%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 6/6 4.8 3.3 59.9% 71.9% 49.8% 52.2% 35.7% 63.3% 42.7%
23 1991 42/48 1.0 1.5 73.3% 62.9% 51.5% 61.3% 49.1% 59.6% 44.0% 1995 6/7 3.3 2.7 55.5% 72.0% 50.2% 62.8% 36.6% 62.2% 38.5%
24 1992 52/62 2.0 1.9 66.2% 66.6% 53.3% 60.0% 44.4% 61.5% 40.7% 1996 35/43 4.3 2.6 61.4% 68.6% 50.5% 58.3% 43.0% 61.7% 37.2%
25 1993 92/98 2.8 2.5 61.6% 71.7% 57.7% 62.0% 46.4% 66.1% 43.4% 1997 36/40 4.2 4.0 56.3% 67.8% 48.1% 57.3% 43.5% 59.0% 37.0%
26 1994 68/80 4.0 3.5 58.1% 71.4% 54.0% 56.3% 46.4% 63.9% 41.8% 1998 36/41 4.0 4.1 56.1% 70.5% 49.8% 55.9% 45.3% 61.4% 39.8%
27 1995 86/101 3.1 2.5 59.5% 71.9% 54.7% 56.6% 54.3% 64.8% 45.6% 1999 29/33 3.2 3.4 60.4% 64.3% 47.6% 54.4% 38.7% 57.1% 37.2%
28 1996 71/86 3.2 2.3 59.3% 72.1% 53.3% 67.9% 45.7% 64.4% 43.4% 2000 29/34 5.4 3.1 61.8% 71.0% 50.7% 54.3% 43.1% 63.3% 37.8%
29 1997 57/66 4.2 2.3 56.8% 73.4% 53.1% 65.8% 49.9% 64.4% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 44/52 3.0 2.1 59.0% 69.3% 52.9% 59.8% 46.5% 62.1% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 12/16 2.7 2.9 61.9% 62.8% 52.0% 61.2% 27.2% 58.1% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.6% 62.5% 61.5% 66.7% — 62.1% 21.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 2/2 3.0 3.0 60.5% 55.9% 29.0% 35.3% 29.2% 45.6% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 527/858 3.0 2.4 61.2% 70.2% 54.1% 61.0% 47.4% 63.6% 42.3% — 191/218 4.1 3.3 58.6% 68.4% 49.2% 55.5% 43.1% 60.4% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Muster Mikael Tillstrom
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.96 1992 1610 130.5 -0.02 +0.86 1.043 51.1% — +50 — 60.0% +0.60 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32
21 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.55 1993 1565 98.7 -2.61 -4.01 0.629 40.6% — +48 — 14.3% -3.43 0–1 1–0 — +0.08
22 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.89 1994 1659 123.3 +0.12 +3.90 1.163 52.0% — +33 — 65.0% +0.95 1–1 2–0 — -0.08
23 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.44 1995 1700 128.4 +0.34 +0.88 1.020 50.0% -116 +8 — 57.9% +0.10 1–1 4–1 (80%) — -0.51
24 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.43 1996 1758 143.5 +0.31 -0.34 0.972 49.6% -20 -38 -90 50.4% -0.11 14–6 (70%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.65
25 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) — +2.71 1997 1645 136.5 -2.09 -0.47 0.901 48.2% +49 +14 — 46.1% -0.39 7–10 (41%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.19
26 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.94 1998 1645 134.6 -0.69 +1.32 1.030 50.7% +38 -20 — 49.5% +0.18 7–7 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — +1.60
27 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) — -0.55 1999 1686 128.2 -2.99 +0.64 0.869 47.5% +38 -88 — 44.3% -0.57 9–5 (64%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.10
28 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.60 2000 1669 136.1 +0.93 +0.39 1.030 50.2% +50 -32 — 49.4% -0.07 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.68
29 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06 — 1833 142.0 -0.81 +0.39 0.964 49.3% +27 -4 -90 49.1% -0.13 48–38 (56%) 50–34 (60%) 111.2 -0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.