H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Thomas Muster vs Nicklas Kulti H2H: 3-1
Thomas Muster holds a 3–1 lead over Nicklas Kulti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on carpet, while Nicklas Kulti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1997 Halle fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 1997* | Halle | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Thomas Muster | 6-2 6-3 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
| Jan 21, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Thomas Muster | 6-4 7-6(9) 6-4 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1993* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Thomas Muster | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Nicklas Kulti | Match data |
| Apr 30, 1993* | Munich | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Nicklas Kulti | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-4 | Thomas Muster | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | #1,092 | #1 | 4,474 | 2,161 | 590 | 267 | 68.8% | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 44 |
| Nicklas Kulti | #977 | #32 | 826 | 1,819 | 150 | 179 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Muster | Nicklas Kulti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #176 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #118 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #51 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1988 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #16 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #79 | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #46 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #99 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1992 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #18 | 1,793 | 0 | 13 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,638 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1993 | 77–21 | 78.6% | #9 | 1,953 | 0 | 20 | 1996 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #64 | 1,636 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1994 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 23 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #154 | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1995 | 84–17 | 83.2% | #3 | 1,990 | 1 | 35 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #290 | 1,602 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1996 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #5 | 1,915 | 1 | 42 | 1999 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #118 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1997 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #9 | 1,820 | 1 | 44 | 2000 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1998 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,800 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #189 | 1,674 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,655 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1075 | 1,608 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |