H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 1-1

Thomas Muster and Nicolas Kiefer are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1998 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Nicolas Kiefer
GER Age 49 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Thomas Muster #23 6-2 6-1 6-3 Nicolas Kiefer #24 Match data
Feb 13, 1998* Dubai ATP 250 R16 Hard Nicolas Kiefer #26 7-6(5) 6-4 Thomas Muster #16 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Nicolas Kiefer #720 #4 2,447 1,984 343 252 57.6% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Nicolas Kiefer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #1198 1,489 0 0
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 1995 3–3 50.0% #206 1,527 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 1996 7–9 43.8% #128 1,562 0 0
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1997 26–16 61.9% #32 1,798 0 1
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1998 31–25 55.4% #35 1,790 0 1
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1999 53–21 71.6% #6 1,921 0 4
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 2000 30–15 66.7% #20 1,921 0 6
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 2001 26–25 51.0% #42 1,766 0 6
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 2002 19–24 44.2% #72 1,718 0 6
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 2003 19–17 52.8% #58 1,727 0 6
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 2004 32–19 62.7% #21 1,897 0 6
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 2005 31–22 58.5% #22 1,854 0 6
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 2006 14–8 63.6% #48 1,843 0 6
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 2007 19–12 61.3% #49 1,893 0 6
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 2008 20–16 55.6% #38 1,876 0 6
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44 2009 12–16 42.9% #116 1,757 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–3 25.0% #722 1,717 0 6
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —