H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Paolo Cane H2H: 0-1

Paolo Cane holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Muster in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paolo Cane leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Cane won the 1991 Bologna quarterfinal 7-6(2) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Paolo Cane
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paolo Cane #224 7-6(2) 7-5 Thomas Muster #64 Match data May 25, 1991* QF Bologna ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44
Paolo Cane #1,381 #26 565 1,853 124 123 50.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Paolo Cane
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1 1983 1–4 20.0% — 1,482 0 0
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1984 0–2 0.0% #555 1,457 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5 1985 2–5 28.6% #199 1,450 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5 1986 23–14 62.2% #44 1,668 0 1
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8 1987 20–16 55.6% #51 1,706 0 1
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1988 15–18 45.5% #81 1,704 0 1
24 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13 1989 24–14 63.2% #33 1,756 0 2
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1990 15–16 48.4% #109 1,688 0 2
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23 1991 8–6 57.1% #122 1,688 0 3
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35 1992 7–10 41.2% #163 1,656 0 3
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42 1993 3–7 30.0% #177 1,598 0 3
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44 1994 6–10 37.5% #145 1,600 0 3
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44 1995 0–1 0.0% #635 1,583 0 3
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44 — — — — — — —
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Muster Paolo Cane
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
21 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 9 6 15 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
26 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 1993 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1994 — — — — 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1% — 20 21 41 48.8% 87 79 166 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 16 20 36 44.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 527/612 of Thomas Muster's and 51/58 of Paolo Cane's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomas Muster Paolo Cane
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 1991 42/48 1.0 1.5 73.3% 62.9% 51.5% 61.3% 49.1% 59.6% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1992 52/62 2.0 1.9 66.2% 66.6% 53.3% 60.0% 44.4% 61.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 92/98 2.8 2.5 61.6% 71.7% 57.7% 62.0% 46.4% 66.1% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 68/80 4.0 3.5 58.1% 71.4% 54.0% 56.3% 46.4% 63.9% 41.8% 1991 10/14 6.3 1.3 51.0% 71.3% 51.5% 63.4% 48.6% 62.1% 39.8%
27 1995 86/101 3.1 2.5 59.5% 71.9% 54.7% 56.6% 54.3% 64.8% 45.6% 1992 16/17 5.7 2.2 54.6% 71.3% 51.8% 56.6% 36.8% 62.4% 37.4%
28 1996 71/86 3.2 2.3 59.3% 72.1% 53.3% 67.9% 45.7% 64.4% 43.4% 1993 9/10 5.7 2.2 52.2% 72.0% 45.6% 58.6% 33.5% 59.7% 37.1%
29 1997 57/66 4.2 2.3 56.8% 73.4% 53.1% 65.8% 49.9% 64.4% 38.4% 1994 15/16 3.9 2.0 48.5% 66.8% 47.1% 55.9% 42.1% 56.5% 38.4%
30 1998 44/52 3.0 2.1 59.0% 69.3% 52.9% 59.8% 46.5% 62.1% 40.5% 1995 1/1 4.0 1.0 45.5% 50.0% 37.5% 44.4% — 43.2% 20.0%
31 1999 12/16 2.7 2.9 61.9% 62.8% 52.0% 61.2% 27.2% 58.1% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 1/1 5.0 2.0 60.6% 62.5% 61.5% 66.7% — 62.1% 21.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 2/2 3.0 3.0 60.5% 55.9% 29.0% 35.3% 29.2% 45.6% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 527/858 3.0 2.4 61.2% 70.2% 54.1% 61.0% 47.4% 63.6% 42.3% — 51/247 5.3 1.9 51.5% 69.7% 49.0% 57.8% 39.3% 59.8% 37.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Muster Paolo Cane
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.90 1983 1482 102.2 — — — — +62 — — 30.8% -1.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.46
19 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.14 1984 1457 100.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.28
20 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.96 1985 1451 106.2 — — — — — -2 — 35.3% -0.76 0–2 0–1 — +0.43
21 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.55 1986 1668 140.6 — — — — -133 +42 — 56.8% +0.29 13–8 (62%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.85
22 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.89 1987 1706 138.9 — — — — -92 +43 — 51.0% +0.05 8–4 (67%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.47
23 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.44 1988 1705 131.4 — — — — +2 -25 — 45.7% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.73
24 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.43 1989 1756 138.8 — — — — -79 +94 — 57.8% +0.27 9–1 (90%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.63
25 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) — +2.71 1990 1689 130.4 — — — — +19 +67 — 48.6% -0.24 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.16
26 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.94 1991 1689 122.0 +0.78 +0.31 1.049 51.3% -42 +118 — 55.9% +0.38 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.45
27 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) — -0.55 1992 1657 119.9 +0.98 -1.30 0.996 49.7% -14 +70 — 45.2% -0.12 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.12
28 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.60 1993 1599 109.2 -0.36 -0.69 0.919 48.3% +27 +55 — 38.5% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.35
29 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.07 1994 1601 126.5 -2.00 -0.22 0.884 47.5% — +49 — 36.1% -1.08 3–3 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.94
30 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.16 1995 1583 93.4 -0.27 -2.52 0.352 32.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.09
31 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06 — 1854 137.8 -0.20 -0.58 0.939 48.8% -32 +51 — 49.0% -0.14 52–39 (57%) 46–43 (52%) 106.8 +0.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.