H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Pavel Slozil H2H: 0-1

Pavel Slozil holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Muster in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pavel Slozil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pavel Slozil won the 1984 Vienna Open round of 16 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Pavel Slozil
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pavel Slozil #51 6-4 6-2 Thomas Muster Match data Oct 26, 1984* R16 Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,165 590 268 68.8% 1 8 0 4 31 44
Pavel Slozil #550 #12 0 1,791 142 160 47.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Pavel Slozil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,612 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,741 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1975 1–6 14.3% #218 1,481 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,915 0 5 1976 1–5 16.7% #310 1,443 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,867 0 5 1977 0–2 0.0% #281 1,419 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,861 0 8 1978 5–5 50.0% #190 1,509 0 0
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1979 19–18 51.4% #78 1,657 0 0
24 1992 39–23 62.9% #18 1,783 0 13 1980 10–10 50.0% #68 1,701 0 0
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1981 18–16 52.9% #68 1,721 0 1
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,832 0 23 1982 19–18 51.4% #49 1,679 0 1
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 2,005 1 35 1983 22–21 51.2% #81 1,680 0 1
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,927 1 42 1984 21–17 55.3% #40 1,733 0 1
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,823 1 44 1985 18–26 40.9% #95 1,644 0 2
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,801 1 44 1986 8–16 33.3% #165 1,588 0 2
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,675 1 44 — — — — — — —
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,656 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomas Muster Pavel Slozil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1 5 6 16.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 39 9 48 81.3% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1977 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1990 10 2 12 83.3% 31 10 41 75.6% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1978 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1992 7 5 12 58.3% 30 13 43 69.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1980 0 3 3 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1993 18 7 25 72.0% 55 10 65 84.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1981 6 3 9 66.7% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1994 18 10 28 64.3% 33 10 43 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 15 9 24 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1995 9 6 15 60.0% 65 3 68 95.6% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 15 11 26 57.7% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0%
28 1996 13 8 21 61.9% 46 4 50 92.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 7 9 22.2% 1984 9 4 13 69.2% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1997 27 8 35 77.1% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1985 4 9 13 30.8% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
30 1998 11 7 18 61.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 3 3 6 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 85 231 63.2% 397 128 525 75.6% 6 9 15 40.0% 41 46 87 47.1% — 30 39 69 43.5% 95 87 182 52.2% 0 6 6 0.0% 17 28 45 37.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomas Muster Pavel Slozil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1533 117.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1612 126.8 — — — — — +22 — 50.0% -0.15 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1741 147.7 — — — — -223 +71 — 54.8% +0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) — -1.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 1754 137.1 — — — — -95 +27 — 55.2% +0.25 9–5 (64%) 11–6 (65%) — -0.14 1975 1482 115.7 — — — — +51 — — 27.8% -1.22 1–3 (25%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.12
20 1988 1916 160.0 — — — — -207 +120 — 67.1% +1.44 12–2 (86%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.96 1976 1444 99.6 — — — — +45 — — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.98
21 1989 1868 141.2 — — — — -42 +130 — 64.5% +0.91 3–4 (43%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.55 1977 1419 92.9 — — — — — — — 28.6% -2.57 0–1 2–0 — +0.16
22 1990 1862 152.4 — — — — -32 +106 — 65.8% +0.93 13–4 (76%) 14–5 (74%) — +0.89 1978 1510 128.1 — — — — — +48 — 50.0% +0.42 1–1 0–1 — +0.03
23 1991 1836 142.4 -0.24 +3.28 1.088 51.7% -95 +121 — 58.8% +0.61 12–9 (57%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.44 1979 1657 135.7 — — — — -121 +55 — 50.6% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 6–4 (60%) — +0.92
24 1992 1783 142.2 +0.70 +1.68 1.059 50.8% -81 +156 — 56.4% +0.48 16–5 (76%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.43 1980 1701 135.2 — — — — -180 +64 — 48.9% -0.47 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.47
25 1993 1954 154.4 +4.84 +4.04 1.280 54.2% -117 +137 — 71.5% +1.48 17–7 (71%) 16–17 (48%) — +2.71 1981 1722 140.9 — — — — -95 +28 — 54.9% +0.39 4–8 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.37
26 1994 1832 152.5 +2.55 +2.88 1.158 52.7% +6 +172 — 65.5% +1.10 15–12 (56%) 18–13 (58%) — +0.94 1982 1679 137.1 — — — — -68 +89 — 52.2% +0.26 4–6 (40%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.28
27 1995 2006 162.1 +3.78 +6.50 1.294 54.8% -159 +281 — 75.0% +1.55 20–9 (69%) 27–8 (77%) — -0.55 1983 1680 138.5 — — — — -58 +64 — 50.5% -0.13 6–6 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.67
28 1996 1928 153.9 +2.83 +4.89 1.219 53.6% -136 +345 -340 71.6% +1.36 15–5 (75%) 19–9 (68%) — +1.60 1984 1733 137.6 — — — — -18 -9 — 51.6% +0.13 7–3 (70%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.01
29 1997 1824 152.8 +2.58 +1.22 1.077 51.5% +70 +208 -208 61.7% +0.64 12–9 (57%) 17–10 (63%) — -0.07 1985 1644 127.6 — — — — -42 +82 — 44.7% -0.34 4–7 (36%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.23
30 1998 1801 149.6 +0.50 +1.96 1.068 51.4% +43 +123 — 56.8% +0.65 11–3 (79%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.16 1986 1589 122.5 — — — — +53 +14 — 41.3% -0.44 2–7 (22%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.26
31 1999 1676 130.2 -0.85 -2.23 0.815 47.0% +114 +110 — 35.0% -0.85 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 2010 1656 99.5 -1.45 +0.41 0.576 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 2011 1609 96.4 -3.83 -0.41 0.661 41.0% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2165 156.5 +2.51 +3.47 1.162 52.7% -56 +164 -287 64.1% +0.95 164–84 (66%) 161–108 (60%) 106.5 -0.06 — 1792 140.4 — — — — -47 +50 — 48.4% -0.11 39–49 (44%) 46–46 (50%) 100.5 +0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.