H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Thomas Muster vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 2-2
Thomas Muster and Richard Krajicek are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 2–1 on clay, while Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1996 Tour Finals round-robin match 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 1996 | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | RR | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 7-6(4) 6-7(5) 6-3 | Thomas Muster | Match data |
| May 20, 1996* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | F | Clay | Thomas Muster | 6-2 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| May 7, 1994* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Richard Krajicek | 6-4 6-4 | Thomas Muster | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1993* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Thomas Muster | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | #1,092 | #1 | 4,474 | 2,161 | 590 | 267 | 68.8% | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 44 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomas Muster | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1987 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #16 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1989 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1990 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1992 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #18 | 1,793 | 0 | 13 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 1993 | 77–21 | 78.6% | #9 | 1,953 | 0 | 20 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 1994 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 23 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 1995 | 84–17 | 83.2% | #3 | 1,990 | 1 | 35 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 1996 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #5 | 1,915 | 1 | 42 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 1997 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #9 | 1,820 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,800 | 1 | 44 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #189 | 1,674 | 1 | 44 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |
| 42 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,655 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 43 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1075 | 1,608 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |