H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Stefan Edberg H2H: 1-8

Stefan Edberg holds a 8–1 lead over Thomas Muster in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 3–0 on clay and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1996 Paris Masters third round 6-2 RET.

AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 8
9 main draw meetings
SWE Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 31, 1996* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Stefan Edberg #18 6-2 (ret.) Thomas Muster #6 Match data
Oct 11, 1996* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Carpet Stefan Edberg #21 6-4 6-7(2) 7-5 Thomas Muster #3 Match data
Jun 15, 1996* Queen's Club ATP 250 SF Grass Stefan Edberg #26 6-7(2) 6-3 6-2 Thomas Muster #2 Match data
Mar 12, 1995* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Stefan Edberg #16 2-6 6-4 6-1 Thomas Muster #18 Match data
Apr 24, 1994* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Stefan Edberg #3 6-7(8) 7-6(2) 6-4 Thomas Muster #12 Match data
Jan 28, 1994* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Stefan Edberg #4 6-2 6-3 6-4 Thomas Muster #10 Match data
Jan 27, 1989* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Thomas Muster #15 (w/o) Stefan Edberg #5 Match data
May 6, 1988* Forest Hills ATP 250 R16 Clay Stefan Edberg #3 6-4 6-3 Thomas Muster #57 Match data
Jul 10, 1986* Gstaad ATP 250 R32 Clay Stefan Edberg #6 6-3 7-6 Thomas Muster #64 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Stefan Edberg #1,347 #1 3,997 2,233 744 246 75.2% 6 5 1 0 29 41

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Stefan Edberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0 1982 0–3 0.0% 1,463 0 0
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 1983 12–10 54.5% #54 1,616 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 1984 27–18 60.0% #20 1,823 0 1
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1985 58–17 77.3% #5 2,129 1 5
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1986 66–20 76.7% #5 2,121 1 8
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1987 75–12 86.2% #2 2,206 2 15
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1988 54–15 78.3% #5 2,080 3 18
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1989 58–16 78.4% #3 2,149 3 20
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1990 67–13 83.8% #1 2,172 4 27
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1991 73–14 83.9% #1 2,146 5 33
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1992 64–19 77.1% #2 2,044 6 36
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 1993 58–22 72.5% #5 1,986 6 37
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1994 53–23 69.7% #7 1,854 6 40
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 1995 35–19 64.8% #23 1,823 6 41
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 1996 44–25 63.8% #14 1,890 6 41
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44