H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Todd Martin H2H: 1-4

Todd Martin holds a 4–1 lead over Thomas Muster in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Todd Martin leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 1999 Sydney semifinal 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Todd Martin
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 16, 1999* Sydney ATP 250 SF Hard Todd Martin #16 6-2 6-1 Thomas Muster #25 Match data
Aug 13, 1998* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Todd Martin #31 6-3 6-4 Thomas Muster #24 Match data
Apr 16, 1998* Barcelona ATP 250 R32 Clay Todd Martin #65 6-4 7-6(4) Thomas Muster #27 Match data
Oct 10, 1997* Vienna ATP 250 R16 Carpet Todd Martin #51 6-4 3-6 6-4 Thomas Muster #12 Match data
May 18, 1996* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Thomas Muster #2 1-6 6-4 6-2 Todd Martin #18 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Todd Martin #145 #4 2,969 2,063 398 222 64.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Todd Martin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1990 3–4 42.9% #269 1,508 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1991 10–8 55.6% #134 1,648 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1992 22–19 53.7% #87 1,724 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1993 45–23 66.2% #13 1,886 0 1
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1994 50–19 72.5% #10 1,943 0 3
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1995 45–21 68.2% #18 1,912 0 4
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1996 49–20 71.0% #12 1,926 0 5
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1997 13–7 65.0% #81 1,914 0 5
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 1998 43–20 68.3% #16 1,998 0 7
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1999 42–17 71.2% #7 1,914 0 8
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 2000 14–11 56.0% #55 1,887 0 8
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 2001 13–11 54.2% #57 1,823 0 8
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44 2002 24–16 60.0% #47 1,788 0 8
32 — — — — — — — 2003 15–11 57.7% #68 1,828 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2004 10–15 40.0% #145 1,684 0 8
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —