H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 7-0

Thomas Muster holds a 7–0 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 6–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1996 Halle third round 7-6(6) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 57 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 20, 1996* Halle ATP 250 R32 Grass Thomas Muster #2 7-6(6) 6-2 Tomas Carbonell #48 Match data
Apr 25, 1996* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Thomas Muster #2 7-5 6-4 Tomas Carbonell #47 Match data
Sep 14, 1995* Bucharest ATP 250 R32 Clay Thomas Muster #3 6-4 6-4 Tomas Carbonell #79 Match data
Jul 22, 1995* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 QF Clay Thomas Muster #4 6-2 6-0 Tomas Carbonell #90 Match data
Jun 19, 1994* St. Poelten ATP 250 F Clay Thomas Muster #11 4-6 6-2 6-4 Tomas Carbonell #66 Match data
Jun 19, 1993* Genova ATP 250 QF Clay Thomas Muster #15 6-0 5-7 6-3 Tomas Carbonell #80 Match data
Jul 26, 1991* Hilversum ATP 250 R16 Clay Thomas Muster #66 6-7(5) 6-1 6-1 Tomas Carbonell #82 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,776 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Tomas Carbonell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,558 0 0
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,623 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,708 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,623 0 0
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,658 0 1
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,580 0 1
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,639 0 1
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,677 0 1
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,585 0 2
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,619 0 2
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,581 0 2
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44 — — — — — — —
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —