H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Thomas Muster vs Tomas Smid H2H: 2-1

Thomas Muster holds a 2–1 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1988 Palermo fourth round 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 30, 1988* Palermo ATP 250 R16 Clay Thomas Muster #13 6-4 6-2 Tomas Smid #80 Match data
Oct 22, 1987* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomas Muster #69 7-6 6-3 Tomas Smid #43 Match data
Aug 15, 1987* Prague ATP 250 QF Clay Tomas Smid #51 7-5 5-7 7-5 Thomas Muster #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,998 497 318 61.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomas Muster Tomas Smid
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0
21 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5 1977 16–18 47.1% #67 1,637 0 0
22 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1
23 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,870 0 2
24 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13 1980 45–21 68.2% #23 1,950 0 4
25 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20 1981 54–28 65.9% #28 1,864 0 5
26 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,901 0 7
27 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,902 0 9
28 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 9
29 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 10
30 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,721 0 10
31 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,729 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,656 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,537 0 10
42 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44 — — — — — — —
43 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44 — — — — — — —