H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Thomas Muster vs Wojtek Kowalski H2H: 1-0
Thomas Muster holds a 1–0 lead over Wojtek Kowalski in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomas Muster leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomas Muster won the 1996 Cincinnati Masters third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1996* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Thomas Muster | 6-1 6-1 | Wojtek Kowalski | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Muster | #1,092 | #1 | 4,474 | 2,161 | 590 | 267 | 68.8% | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 44 |
| Wojtek Kowalski | #1,360 | #109 | 316 | 1,527 | 6 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Thomas Muster | Wojtek Kowalski | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #198 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #98 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #328 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #157 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #270 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #16 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #21 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #7 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #35 | 1,835 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #18 | 1,793 | 0 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 77–21 | 78.6% | #9 | 1,953 | 0 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 54–26 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 84–17 | 83.2% | #3 | 1,990 | 1 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 65–21 | 75.6% | #5 | 1,915 | 1 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #9 | 1,820 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,800 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #189 | 1,674 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,655 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1075 | 1,608 | 1 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |