H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Thomaz Bellucci vs Federico Delbonis H2H: 2-5

Federico Delbonis holds a 5–2 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Federico Delbonis leads 5–2 on clay. Most recently, Federico Delbonis won the 2018 Roland Garros first round 6-1 6-3 3-6 6-1.

BRA Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 5
7 main draw meetings
ARG Age 35 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 29, 2018* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Federico Delbonis #69 6-1 6-3 3-6 6-1 Thomaz Bellucci #278 Match data
May 19, 2016* Geneva ATP 250 R16 Clay Federico Delbonis #33 6-3 6-0 Thomaz Bellucci #39 Match data
May 3, 2015 Madrid Masters Masters 1000 Q2 Q Clay Thomaz Bellucci #74 4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(3) Federico Delbonis #70 Match data
Jul 25, 2014* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Thomaz Bellucci #93 6-4 6-4 Federico Delbonis #56 Match data
May 2, 2014* Munich ATP 250 R16 Clay Thomaz Bellucci #122 5-7 6-3 6-2 Federico Delbonis #44 Match data
Mar 1, 2014* Sao Paulo ATP 250 SF Clay Federico Delbonis #61 6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 Thomaz Bellucci #108 Match data
Jul 25, 2013* Gstaad ATP 250 R32 Clay Federico Delbonis #65 7-5 7-6(2) Thomaz Bellucci #113 Match data
Feb 3, 2012* Santiago ATP 250 R16 Clay Federico Delbonis #172 6-2 7-5 Thomaz Bellucci #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomaz Bellucci #1,303 #21 1,732 1,937 179 201 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Federico Delbonis #939 #33 1,435 1,905 158 195 44.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Federico Delbonis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 0–1 0.0% #195 1,530 0 0
19 2010 0–2 0.0% #160 1,469 0 0
20 2008 3–11 21.4% #85 1,554 0 0 2011 3–2 60.0% #166 1,558 0 0
21 2009 18–17 51.4% #36 1,781 0 1 2012 6–9 40.0% #133 1,716 0 0
22 2010 32–24 57.1% #31 1,795 0 2 2013 12–8 60.0% #55 1,757 0 0
23 2011 23–24 48.9% #37 1,710 0 2 2014 20–27 42.6% #60 1,660 0 1
24 2012 24–21 53.3% #33 1,828 0 3 2015 15–18 45.5% #52 1,692 0 1
25 2013 7–16 30.4% #125 1,676 0 3 2016 24–22 52.2% #41 1,754 0 2
26 2014 16–13 55.2% #65 1,818 0 3 2017 11–10 52.4% #68 1,811 0 2
27 2015 29–27 51.8% #37 1,856 0 4 2018 11–18 37.9% #80 1,723 0 2
28 2016 14–21 40.0% #61 1,758 0 4 2019 14–20 41.2% #76 1,686 0 2
29 2017 12–20 37.5% #113 1,693 0 4 2020 9–12 42.9% #82 1,705 0 2
30 2018 1–5 16.7% #225 1,654 0 4 2021 24–24 50.0% #44 1,719 0 2
31 2022 8–21 27.6% #125 1,672 0 2
32 2023 1–1 50.0% #279 1,599 0 2
33 2021 0–1 0.0% #449 1,610 0 4
35 2023 0–1 0.0% #1303 1,598 0 4