H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Thomaz Bellucci vs Fernando Verdasco H2H: 1-3

Fernando Verdasco holds a 3–1 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Fernando Verdasco leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Verdasco won the 2011 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-3 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomaz Bellucci
BRA Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Fernando Verdasco
ESP Age 42 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 2011* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #21 6-3 7-6(4) Thomaz Bellucci #34 Match data
Feb 23, 2011* Acapulco ATP 500 R32 Clay Thomaz Bellucci #36 6-2 4-6 6-3 Fernando Verdasco #9 Match data
Mar 15, 2009* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #10 7-5 6-1 Thomaz Bellucci #69 Match data
Jul 23, 2008* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Fernando Verdasco #11 1-6 6-3 6-2 Thomaz Bellucci #80 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomaz Bellucci #1,303 #21 1,732 1,937 179 201 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Fernando Verdasco #893 #7 3,900 2,125 549 441 55.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Fernando Verdasco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% #173 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 7–12 36.8% #109 1,592 0 0
20 2008 3–11 21.4% #85 1,554 0 0 2004 31–25 55.4% #36 1,732 0 1
21 2009 18–17 51.4% #36 1,781 0 1 2005 34–27 55.7% #32 1,791 0 1
22 2010 32–24 57.1% #31 1,795 0 2 2006 31–25 55.4% #35 1,726 0 1
23 2011 23–24 48.9% #37 1,710 0 2 2007 33–26 55.9% #26 1,864 0 1
24 2012 24–21 53.3% #33 1,828 0 3 2008 45–27 62.5% #16 1,876 0 2
25 2013 7–16 30.4% #125 1,676 0 3 2009 51–24 68.0% #9 2,001 0 3
26 2014 16–13 55.2% #65 1,818 0 3 2010 43–21 67.2% #9 1,926 0 5
27 2015 29–27 51.8% #37 1,856 0 4 2011 34–24 58.6% #24 1,930 0 5
28 2016 14–21 40.0% #61 1,758 0 4 2012 32–21 60.4% #24 1,915 0 5
29 2017 12–20 37.5% #113 1,693 0 4 2013 27–24 52.9% #30 1,891 0 5
30 2018 1–5 16.7% #225 1,654 0 4 2014 26–20 56.5% #33 1,880 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 2015 24–26 48.0% #49 1,822 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 2016 29–26 52.7% #42 1,824 0 7
33 2021 0–1 0.0% #449 1,610 0 4 2017 29–25 53.7% #35 1,895 0 7
34 — — — — — — — 2018 33–28 54.1% #28 1,915 0 7
35 2023 0–1 0.0% #1303 1,598 0 4 2019 26–27 49.1% #49 1,810 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2020 6–7 46.2% #65 1,768 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2021 2–8 20.0% #154 1,627 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2022 5–11 31.2% #124 1,603 0 7
39 — — — — — — — 2023 0–5 0.0% #651 1,535 0 7