H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC

Thomaz Bellucci vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 2-3

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 3–2 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 2–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2016 Monte Carlo Masters second round 7-5 6-1.

BRA Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 12, 2016* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #38 7-5 6-1 Thomaz Bellucci #35 Match data
Jul 31, 2013* Kitzbuhel ATP 250 R32 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #72 6-7(1) 6-3 7-6(4) Thomaz Bellucci #115 Match data
Apr 23, 2010* Barcelona ATP 500 R16 Clay Thomaz Bellucci #33 6-4 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #42 Match data
Mar 16, 2010* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #49 4-6 6-2 6-1 Thomaz Bellucci #32 Match data
Oct 1, 2009* Bangkok ATP 250 R32 Hard Thomaz Bellucci #61 6-4 7-6(7) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Thomaz Bellucci #1,303 #21 1,732 1,937 179 201 47.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2008 3–11 21.4% #85 1,554 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0
21 2009 18–17 51.4% #36 1,781 0 1 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0
22 2010 32–24 57.1% #31 1,795 0 2 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0
23 2011 23–24 48.9% #37 1,710 0 2 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0
24 2012 24–21 53.3% #33 1,828 0 3 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0
25 2013 7–16 30.4% #125 1,676 0 3 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0
26 2014 16–13 55.2% #65 1,818 0 3 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1
27 2015 29–27 51.8% #37 1,856 0 4 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2
28 2016 14–21 40.0% #61 1,758 0 4 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2
29 2017 12–20 37.5% #113 1,693 0 4 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2
30 2018 1–5 16.7% #225 1,654 0 4 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5
33 2021 0–1 0.0% #449 1,610 0 4 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5
35 2023 0–1 0.0% #1303 1,598 0 4 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5