H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Thomaz Bellucci vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 3-1
Thomaz Bellucci holds a 3–1 lead over Janko Tipsarevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Thomaz Bellucci leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2017 Quito fourth round 7-6(8) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2017* | Quito | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Thomaz Bellucci | 7-6(8) 7-6(2) | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2012* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Thomaz Bellucci | 6-7(6) 6-4 6-2 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
| Jul 14, 2012* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2009* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Thomaz Bellucci | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | Janko Tipsarevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Bellucci | Janko Tipsarevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |