H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomaz Bellucci vs Joachim Johansson H2H: 1-0
Thomaz Bellucci holds a 1–0 lead over Joachim Johansson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2009 Stockholm quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2009* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Thomaz Bellucci | 7-6(4) 6-3 | Joachim Johansson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Joachim Johansson | #705 | #9 | 1,980 | 1,942 | 69 | 53 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Bellucci | Joachim Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #773 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #193 | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #350 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #771 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #365 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #694 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |