H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Thomaz Bellucci vs Leonardo Mayer H2H: 3-1

Thomaz Bellucci holds a 3–1 lead over Leonardo Mayer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Thomaz Bellucci leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2012 Sao Paulo quarterfinal 3-6 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Thomaz Bellucci
BRA Age 38 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Leonardo Mayer
ARG Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thomaz Bellucci #38 3-6 6-2 7-5 Leonardo Mayer #80 Match data Feb 18, 2012* QF Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay
Leonardo Mayer #59 6-4 6-1 Thomaz Bellucci #28 Match data May 20, 2010* R16 Nice ATP 250 Clay
Thomaz Bellucci #28 6-4 3-6 6-1 Leonardo Mayer #63 Match data Apr 27, 2010* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Thomaz Bellucci #45 7-5 3-6 6-3 Leonardo Mayer #71 Match data Oct 23, 2009* R16 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Thomaz Bellucci #1,303 #21 1,732 1,932 182 204 47.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Leonardo Mayer #748 #21 1,605 1,938 166 194 46.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Leonardo Mayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2008 3–12 20.0% #85 1,540 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 18–17 51.4% #36 1,781 0 1 2008 1–1 50.0% #115 1,476 0 0
22 2010 32–24 57.1% #31 1,796 0 2 2009 18–18 50.0% #75 1,664 0 0
23 2011 23–24 48.9% #37 1,711 0 2 2010 12–19 38.7% #94 1,652 0 0
24 2012 24–22 52.2% #33 1,819 0 3 2011 4–7 36.4% #78 1,676 0 0
25 2013 7–16 30.4% #125 1,678 0 3 2012 11–14 44.0% #71 1,726 0 0
26 2014 16–13 55.2% #65 1,794 0 3 2013 12–18 40.0% #94 1,718 0 0
27 2015 29–27 51.8% #37 1,854 0 4 2014 26–20 56.5% #28 1,832 0 1
28 2016 17–22 43.6% #61 1,801 0 4 2015 24–23 51.1% #35 1,839 0 1
29 2017 12–20 37.5% #113 1,701 0 4 2016 9–15 37.5% #139 1,729 0 1
30 2018 1–5 16.7% #225 1,659 0 4 2017 11–8 57.9% #52 1,796 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2018 22–25 46.8% #56 1,747 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2019 16–18 47.1% #92 1,710 0 2
33 2021 0–1 0.0% #449 1,614 0 4 2020 0–7 0.0% #135 1,605 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2021 0–1 0.0% #309 1,520 0 2
35 2023 0–1 0.0% #1303 1,603 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Leonardo Mayer
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2008 1 8 9 11.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 7 8 15 46.7% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2010 11 13 24 45.8% 19 10 29 65.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 11 11 22 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2011 7 13 20 35.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 6 12 18 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2012 10 11 21 47.6% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2013 3 7 10 30.0% 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2014 6 5 11 54.5% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2013 3 6 9 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 2015 9 14 23 39.1% 20 11 31 64.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 5 9 14 35.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 2016 9 9 18 50.0% 7 11 18 38.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 10 12 22 45.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 4 2 6 66.7%
29 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2018 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 2017 4 5 9 44.4% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 9 12 21 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 6 6 12 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2020 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2023 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 64 94 158 40.5% 112 98 210 53.3% 6 12 18 33.3% — 63 91 154 40.9% 87 84 171 50.9% 16 19 35 45.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 375/386 of Thomaz Bellucci's and 358/360 of Leonardo Mayer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Leonardo Mayer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2008 14/15 6.2 3.5 56.6% 66.0% 50.1% 52.2% 38.9% 58.5% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 35/35 6.7 2.6 61.2% 71.4% 51.4% 58.0% 37.9% 63.5% 34.5% 2008 2/2 7.5 3.5 52.5% 86.6% 51.5% 12.5% 33.3% 69.5% 35.8%
22 2010 55/56 7.2 2.8 58.2% 71.4% 50.2% 56.7% 43.0% 62.5% 37.8% 2009 35/36 6.6 2.6 59.4% 75.3% 53.0% 56.0% 38.7% 66.4% 37.7%
23 2011 47/47 6.3 2.7 61.1% 71.6% 49.9% 57.9% 40.4% 63.2% 37.7% 2010 31/31 6.8 3.3 61.3% 73.8% 51.3% 64.9% 46.1% 65.1% 32.4%
24 2012 44/46 5.8 2.8 56.5% 70.7% 52.6% 57.2% 41.6% 62.7% 38.2% 2011 11/11 3.1 2.8 61.4% 69.3% 55.2% 46.1% 36.0% 63.9% 32.3%
25 2013 22/23 6.1 3.5 54.3% 68.1% 51.0% 54.2% 33.5% 60.6% 34.8% 2012 25/25 6.7 4.0 59.3% 72.1% 51.5% 57.8% 37.7% 63.6% 32.1%
26 2014 28/29 6.8 3.3 56.3% 73.0% 51.8% 60.0% 47.9% 63.8% 36.6% 2013 29/30 4.7 3.7 61.7% 68.6% 50.0% 58.6% 49.2% 61.4% 34.2%
27 2015 56/56 5.9 3.5 58.5% 72.0% 52.7% 60.2% 39.5% 63.9% 38.3% 2014 46/46 6.6 4.1 59.7% 74.5% 53.7% 57.6% 42.4% 66.4% 36.4%
28 2016 34/39 4.8 4.1 56.8% 68.9% 51.4% 53.6% 43.7% 61.3% 38.2% 2015 47/47 6.7 3.0 63.8% 74.8% 54.2% 65.0% 36.3% 67.4% 35.1%
29 2017 32/32 4.9 4.3 58.3% 67.2% 51.6% 49.6% 45.3% 60.8% 36.8% 2016 24/24 4.7 3.5 61.8% 71.4% 48.5% 62.3% 38.0% 62.4% 35.9%
30 2018 6/6 4.2 3.3 59.0% 68.8% 49.0% 57.0% 45.5% 60.7% 40.2% 2017 19/19 6.7 2.7 61.7% 67.4% 53.7% 48.8% 34.0% 63.2% 34.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 47/47 6.5 3.3 61.7% 73.6% 53.2% 56.0% 38.6% 65.7% 34.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/34 7.9 5.0 58.3% 74.7% 53.5% 59.2% 33.6% 65.9% 34.1%
33 2021 1/1 3.0 3.0 60.9% 59.5% 44.4% 33.3% 11.1% 53.6% 34.3% 2020 7/7 5.3 6.3 58.0% 69.3% 51.3% 60.1% 27.6% 61.8% 26.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 1/1 0.0 6.0 50.8% 76.7% 37.9% 50.0% — 57.6% 24.5%
35 2023 1/1 0.0 3.0 53.5% 55.3% 51.5% 62.5% 0.0% 53.5% 25.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 375/386 6.1 3.2 58.1% 70.5% 51.3% 56.5% 41.2% 62.4% 37.1% — 358/360 6.3 3.6 60.8% 73.0% 52.6% 58.3% 39.1% 65.1% 34.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Thomaz Bellucci Leonardo Mayer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2007 1485 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1541 122.5 -1.95 -2.46 0.810 46.6% -85 +113 — 34.1% -1.14 0–5 (0%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.12 2007 1495 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1782 138.6 +0.15 -2.07 0.944 49.0% -61 -3 — 50.0% -0.28 6–5 (55%) 10–5 (67%) — +0.66 2008 1476 101.9 -0.40 -0.71 1.172 51.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.01
22 2010 1797 150.7 -0.44 +1.56 1.007 50.0% -63 +117 -167 54.1% +0.16 13–10 (57%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.82 2009 1665 131.8 +2.06 +0.49 1.120 51.6% -73 -41 -95 54.7% +0.43 1–8 (11%) 7–9 (44%) — +0.83
23 2011 1711 145.3 +0.83 +0.14 1.023 50.1% -61 +227 -72 48.4% -0.07 11–11 (50%) 11–13 (46%) — +2.85 2010 1652 134.7 +1.36 -2.46 0.928 48.7% -71 +91 — 42.3% -0.38 4–5 (44%) 7–14 (33%) — -0.68
24 2012 1819 150.8 +0.10 +1.17 1.023 50.4% -118 +145 — 51.3% +0.08 7–10 (41%) 10–11 (48%) — -0.64 2011 1677 124.2 +0.17 -2.16 0.894 47.8% — +150 — 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.29
25 2013 1679 127.7 -1.87 -1.99 0.883 47.7% -32 +132 — 36.2% -0.97 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.53 2012 1726 138.2 +1.16 -3.47 0.882 48.0% -95 +90 -215 42.9% -0.59 2–3 (40%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.21
26 2014 1794 144.9 +0.75 -0.17 1.011 50.2% -16 +20 — 49.3% +0.04 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47 2013 1718 135.8 -0.98 -2.09 0.885 47.8% -75 +59 -185 44.4% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.11
27 2015 1855 155.7 +0.52 +2.08 1.061 50.9% -84 +107 — 50.4% +0.01 11–10 (52%) 16–13 (55%) — -0.93 2014 1832 147.6 +2.77 -0.26 1.083 51.2% -185 +142 -147 55.0% +0.19 8–9 (47%) 16–9 (64%) — +0.33
28 2016 1801 145.0 -1.11 +1.56 0.986 49.7% -29 +10 -201 44.1% -0.39 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.79 2015 1839 152.1 +2.61 -0.22 1.077 51.2% -111 +71 -78 53.4% +0.27 5–9 (36%) 16–12 (57%) — +1.37
29 2017 1702 134.5 -3.07 +0.19 0.937 48.6% -1 +51 — 39.8% -0.67 5–8 (38%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.46 2016 1729 141.4 -0.34 -0.34 0.955 49.2% -17 +71 — 40.7% -0.34 2–3 (40%) 2–7 (22%) — -1.17
30 2018 1660 117.8 -0.83 -0.48 1.024 50.4% — +58 — 38.9% -0.83 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -0.14 2017 1797 137.1 -0.74 -0.87 0.928 48.2% -65 +75 — 57.4% +0.23 5–2 (71%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.32
31 2019 1628 104.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1747 152.6 +2.05 -1.29 1.007 50.3% -45 +120 -84 50.4% +0.08 8–13 (38%) 12–12 (50%) — -1.16
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1710 139.9 +1.41 -1.47 1.000 50.0% -11 +88 — 50.0% -0.13 5–9 (36%) 17–9 (65%) — +0.77
33 2021 1614 102.4 -1.27 +1.41 0.740 44.1% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.03 2020 1606 116.6 -1.03 -3.14 0.703 45.4% +35 +97 — 23.8% -1.52 0–4 (0%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.19
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1520 93.3 -3.18 -4.11 0.578 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.27
35 2023 1603 103.9 +1.78 -2.27 0.538 41.5% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1933 149.6 -0.36 +0.43 0.987 49.7% -63 +93 -139 47.2% -0.22 70–83 (46%) 89–86 (51%) 100.1 +0.42 — 1939 146.2 +1.33 -1.16 0.989 49.8% -75 +92 -125 48.7% -0.10 44–71 (38%) 106–92 (54%) 97.3 +0.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.