H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomaz Bellucci vs Leonardo Mayer H2H: 3-1
Thomaz Bellucci holds a 3–1 lead over Leonardo Mayer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Thomaz Bellucci leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2012 Sao Paulo quarterfinal 3-6 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2012* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Thomaz Bellucci | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Leonardo Mayer | Match data |
| May 20, 2010* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Leonardo Mayer | 6-4 6-1 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2010* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Thomaz Bellucci | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Leonardo Mayer | Match data |
| Oct 23, 2009* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Thomaz Bellucci | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | Leonardo Mayer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Leonardo Mayer | #748 | #21 | 1,605 | 1,937 | 166 | 194 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Bellucci | Leonardo Mayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #94 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #78 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #35 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #52 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #56 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #92 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,520 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |