H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomaz Bellucci vs Lukas Rosol H2H: 2-0
Thomaz Bellucci holds a 2–0 lead over Lukas Rosol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2013 Stuttgart third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2019 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q1 | Hard | Lukas Rosol | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2016* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Lukas Rosol | 6-2 6-4 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
| Jul 11, 2013* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Thomaz Bellucci | 6-4 6-4 | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2012* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Thomaz Bellucci | 6-2 7-6(4) | Lukas Rosol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Lukas Rosol | #1,777 | #26 | 1,290 | 1,921 | 110 | 148 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Bellucci | Lukas Rosol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #73 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #47 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #55 | 1,846 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #113 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #203 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #142 | 1,703 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #180 | 1,660 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,658 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |