H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomaz Bellucci vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 1-0
Thomaz Bellucci holds a 1–0 lead over Nicolas Kiefer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2009 Gstaad quarterfinal 3-6 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2009* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Thomaz Bellucci | 3-6 1-0 (ret.) | Nicolas Kiefer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Bellucci | Nicolas Kiefer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |