H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomaz Bellucci vs Paolo Lorenzi H2H: 1-2
Paolo Lorenzi holds a 2–1 lead over Thomaz Bellucci in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paolo Lorenzi leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2016 Quito semifinal 3-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2016* | Quito | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Thomaz Bellucci | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| Feb 26, 2015* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paolo Lorenzi | 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
| May 10, 2011* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paolo Lorenzi | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Thomaz Bellucci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Bellucci | Paolo Lorenzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |