H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Thomaz Bellucci vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 1-0
Thomaz Bellucci holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomaz Bellucci leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thomaz Bellucci won the 2016 Shenzhen fourth round 7-6(2) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2016* | Shenzhen | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Thomaz Bellucci | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Bellucci | #1,303 | #21 | 1,732 | 1,937 | 179 | 201 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,748 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Bellucci | Thomas Fabbiano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #85 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #37 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #125 | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2014 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,818 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #113 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #225 | 1,654 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,610 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1303 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |