H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Thomaz Koch vs Bob Hewitt H2H: 1-1
Thomaz Koch and Bob Hewitt are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bob Hewitt leads 1–0 on grass, while Thomaz Koch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bob Hewitt won the 1968 Wimbledon second round 3-6 6-4 3-6 6-3 12-10.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 81
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 86
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1968* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Bob Hewitt | 3-6 6-4 3-6 6-3 12-10 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
| Jan 7, 1968* | Port Elizabeth | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Thomaz Koch | 6-1 7-9 7-5 | Bob Hewitt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Koch | #857 | #24 | 0 | 1,873 | 200 | 157 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Bob Hewitt | #669 | #32 | 0 | 2,005 | 285 | 178 | 61.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Koch | Bob Hewitt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #204 | 1,704 | 0 | 6 | 1968 | 51–15 | 77.3% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 31–11 | 73.8% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1975 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #62 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,822 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1976 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1977 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #263 | 1,706 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 52–16 | 76.5% | — | 1,902 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #157 | 1,855 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | 1979 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,715 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #34 | 1,847 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,627 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,666 | 0 | 11 |
| 37 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #240 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #56 | 1,725 | 0 | 11 |
| 38 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1978 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #206 | 1,596 | 0 | 11 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #546 | 1,547 | 0 | 11 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 11 |