H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Thomaz Koch vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 0-3
Ion Tiriac holds a 3–0 lead over Thomaz Koch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ion Tiriac leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ion Tiriac won the 1971 Hampton quarterfinal 7-5 6-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 81
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1971* | Hampton | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Ion Tiriac | 7-5 6-7 6-1 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
| Aug 16, 1968* | Senigallia | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-8 6-3 6-4 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
| Jul 12, 1968* | Bastad 1 | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-4 4-6 6-2 6-1 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Koch | #857 | #24 | 0 | 1,873 | 200 | 157 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Koch | Ion Tiriac | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #204 | 1,704 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1975 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #62 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1976 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1977 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #263 | 1,706 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 1979 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 |
| 35 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,627 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #240 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 |