H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Thomaz Koch vs Ken Rosewall H2H: 0-2
Ken Rosewall holds a 2–0 lead over Thomaz Koch in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Ken Rosewall leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ken Rosewall won the 1975 Tuscon third round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 81
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 91
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 1975* | Tuscon | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ken Rosewall | 6-3 7-5 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
| Jun 7, 1968* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Ken Rosewall | 8-6 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Koch | #857 | #24 | 0 | 1,873 | 200 | 157 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Ken Rosewall | #255 | #2 | 0 | 2,231 | 541 | 195 | 73.5% | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 40 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Koch | Ken Rosewall | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #204 | 1,704 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1975 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #62 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1976 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1977 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #263 | 1,706 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 1,856 | 1 | 5 |
| 34 | 1979 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 49–21 | 70.0% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 8 |
| 35 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 72–21 | 77.4% | — | 2,083 | 2 | 14 |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,627 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 80–24 | 76.9% | — | 2,154 | 3 | 22 |
| 37 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #240 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 61–15 | 80.3% | — | 2,107 | 4 | 29 |
| 38 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #6 | 2,102 | 4 | 34 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 28–8 | 77.8% | #9 | 2,106 | 4 | 34 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #6 | 1,994 | 4 | 37 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #13 | 1,974 | 4 | 39 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #12 | 1,975 | 4 | 40 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,808 | 4 | 40 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #207 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |
| 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #255 | 1,746 | 4 | 40 |