H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Thomaz Koch vs Manuel Santana H2H: 1-1
Thomaz Koch and Manuel Santana are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Manuel Santana leads 1–0 on carpet, while Thomaz Koch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuel Santana won the 1970 New York round-robin match 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 81
Left-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 1970 | New York | ATP 250 | RR | Carpet | Manuel Santana | 6-1 | Thomaz Koch | Match data |
| Sep 7, 1968* | Quebec City | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Thomaz Koch | 7-5 0-6 6-4 | Manuel Santana | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomaz Koch | #857 | #24 | 0 | 1,873 | 200 | 157 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Manuel Santana | #374 | #145 | 0 | 1,994 | 113 | 50 | 69.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Thomaz Koch | Manuel Santana | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | 1968 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1969 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1971 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1972 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #204 | 1,704 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1975 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #62 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 | 1968 | 38–11 | 77.6% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1976 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | 1969 | 25–6 | 80.6% | — | 1,909 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 1977 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #263 | 1,706 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 25–8 | 75.8% | — | 1,992 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,875 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | 1979 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,815 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,627 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #188 | 1,743 | 0 | 11 |
| 37 | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #240 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,699 | 0 | 11 |
| 38 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #169 | 1,653 | 0 | 11 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #365 | 1,640 | 0 | 11 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #374 | 1,641 | 0 | 11 |